Paper · 2019 · Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology

Antioxidative, antimitotic, and DNA-damaging activities of Garcinia kola stem bark, Uvaria chamae root, and Olax subscorpioidea root used in the ethnotherapy of cancers

Temidayo D. Popoola; Olufunsho Awodele; Folashayo Babawale; et al.

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Garcinia kola (GK) stem bark, Uvaria chamae (UC) root, and Olax subscorpioidea (OS) root are components of various indigenous/traditional anticancer regimens. It is, therefore, possible that they might combat oxidative stress and impair cellular proliferation linked to carcinogenesis. In this study, we investigated the antioxidative, mito-depressive, and DNA-damaging activities of the three plant extracts in order to provide further mechanistic insights into their potential anticancer roles in documented cancer remedies that include them. Antioxidative properties were investigated in the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and nitric oxide (NO) radical scavenging assays and an animal model of drug (cisplatin)-induced oxidative stress. The Allium cepa assay and the single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) assay were used to assess mito-depressive and DNA-damaging activities. GK and OS showed significantly higher antioxidant activities in the DPPH assay than ascorbic acid; OS had the lowest IC50 of the three plants in the NO assay, comparable to that of ascorbic acid. Pretreatment with the extracts produced an ameliorative and protective effect against the cisplatin-induced oxidative stress as shown by inhibition of lipid peroxidation and improved or restored reduced glutathione and superoxide dismutase levels. In the Allium test, the three extracts produced significant decreases in root growth and also significant cytotoxicity as evidenced by decreased mitotic index. Each of the extracts also showed significantly increased tail DNA (%) in the SCGE assay, indicating the significant DNA-damaging effect. Taken together, this study demonstrates the possible chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic potentials of the three study extracts, which may explain the roles of their source plants in traditional remedies in the therapy of cancers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three extracts significantly decreased Allium root growth.

Taxon
AlliumAlliume0
Treatment
the three extractse0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium
Allium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Didier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the Allium test, the three extracts produced significant decreases in root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three extracts significantly decreased the Allium mitotic index.

Taxon
AlliumAlliume0
Treatment
the three extractse0
Outcome
mitotic indexe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium
Allium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Didier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the Allium test, the three extracts produced significant decreases in root growth and also significant cytotoxicity as evidenced by decreased mitotic index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1488 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · AlliumResults agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

botanical · cytology · AlliumResults agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.