Paper · 2009 · Trends in Biosciences/Trends in biosciences

Interaction effect of Steinernema spp. and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, Glomus intraradices on the development and reproduction of Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid and White) in tomato.

S. S. Hussaini; K. C. Kiran Kumar; Alok Adholeya; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Micro plot studies were conducted at PDBC, Bangalore to evaluate the combined effect of Entomopathogenic Nematodes (EPN), Steinemema abbasi, S. carpocapsae and S. feltiae at three dosages with and without Arbuscular Mycorhizal Fungus (AMF), Glomus intraradices on the development and reproduction of root-knot nematodes, Meluidugyne incognita in tomato. Observations recorded at harvest stage revealed that application of, S. carpocapsae @4x105/m2 along with AMF reduced the no. of galls and egg masses per root system, no. of eggs/eggmass and hatch rate of eggs. Enhancement in growth, development and yield of tomato in terms of shoot height, shoot weight, root length, root weight no. of branches/plant, no. of flowers, no. of fruits and fruit yield was obtained. This treatment was followed by the S. abbasi @ 2x105/m2 + AMF and H. indica alone @4x105/m2. The persistence of H. indica was more in the plot receiving a dose of 4x105/m2 followed by 2x105 and 1x105/m2 however; there was no difference in percent mortality of Gallaria mellonella larvae with and without AM fungus treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. carpocapsae with AMF reduced tomato root galls and egg masses.

Treatment
S. carpocapsae @4x105/m2 along with AMFe0
Interactor
Meluidugyne incognitae1pathogene0
Second interactor
S. carpocapsaeSteinernema carpocapsaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
no. of galls and egg masses per root systeme0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Steinernema carpocapsae
Steinernema carpocapsae · Second interactorMirayana M. Barros, Dennis Chang, Dihong Lu, and Adler R. Dillman · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of, S. carpocapsae @4x105/m2 along with AMF reduced the no. of galls and egg masses per root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–183 · show in text ↑
e1

“root-knot nematodes, Meluidugyne incognita in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment reduced nematode eggs per egg mass and hatch rate.

Treatment
S. carpocapsae @4x105/m2 along with AMFe0
Outcome
no. of eggs/eggmass and hatch rate of eggse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of, S. carpocapsae @4x105/m2 along with AMF reduced the no. of galls and egg masses per root system, no. of eggs/eggmass and hatch rate of eggs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–562 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–183 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment enhanced tomato shoot and root growth.

Outcome
shoot height, shoot weight, root lengthe0
Direction
Enhancemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhancement in growth, development and yield of tomato in terms of shoot height, shoot weight, root length, root weight no. of branches/plant, no. of flowers, no. of fruits and fruit yield was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–765 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment enhanced tomato root weight and branch number.

Outcome
root weight no. of branches/plante0
Direction
Enhancemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhancement in growth, development and yield of tomato in terms of shoot height, shoot weight, root length, root weight no. of branches/plant, no. of flowers, no. of fruits and fruit yield was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–765 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment enhanced tomato flowers, fruit number and fruit yield.

Outcome
no. of flowers, no. of fruits and fruit yielde0
Direction
Enhancemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhancement in growth, development and yield of tomato in terms of shoot height, shoot weight, root length, root weight no. of branches/plant, no. of flowers, no. of fruits and fruit yield was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. abbasi with AMF ranked after the leading treatment.

Treatment
S. abbasi @ 2x105/m2 + AMFe0
Outcome
followed bye0
Direction
followed bye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment was followed by the S. abbasi @ 2x105/m2 + AMF and H. indica alone @4x105/m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H. indica alone ranked after the leading treatment.

Treatment
H. indica alone @4x105/m2e0
Outcome
followed bye0
Direction
followed bye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment was followed by the S. abbasi @ 2x105/m2 + AMF and H. indica alone @4x105/m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H. indica persistence was greatest at 4x105/m2.

Treatment
4x105/m2e0
Outcome
persistence of H. indicae0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
2x105 and 1x105/m2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The persistence of H. indica was more in the plot receiving a dose of 4x105/m2 followed by 2x105 and 1x105/m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungus treatment did not change Galleria larval mortality.

Treatment
AM fungus treatmentse0
Interactor
Gallaria mellonellae0other
Outcome
percent mortality of Gallaria mellonella larvaee0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
without AM fungus treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no difference in percent mortality of Gallaria mellonella larvae with and without AM fungus treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–183 · show in text ↑

Steinernema carpocapsae · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.