Paper · 2019 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Salt effect of potassium fertilizer on productivity and technological quality of sugarcane

Igor Tenório Marinho da Rocha; Fernando José Freire; Emídio Cantídio Almeida de Oliveira; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The K is important for sugar concentration in sugarcane, but the salt effect on K fertilizer may reduce the productivity. The objective of this study was to evaluate productivity of sugarcane, to establish soil and plant K critical levels, and to determine a saline limit of the soil with maximum agronomic efficiency. The sugarcane variety RB992506 was cultivated in the field in Oxisol (Kandic) dystrophic with very sandy and low K content, mainly in subsurface. Six doses of K2O were used: 0; 25; 50; 100; 200; 250 kg ha-1. We evaluated soil and leaf K content, electrical conductivity of the saturated soil paste, productivity and technological quality of the sugarcane. The application of K promoted increase in soil and leaf K levels, increasing also both productivity and the sugar concentration. The dose of maximum agronomic efficiency was 150 kg ha-1 of K2O and production of 116 Mg ha-1. High doses of K (> 200 kg ha-1 of K2O) decreased the productivity due to elevated soil salinity by the application of K fertilizer. The critical levels of K were 0.18 cmolc dm-3 in the soil and 9.53 g kg-1 in the plant and were associated with low doses of K (< 25 kg ha-1 of K2O). The salinity limits that reduced productivity were 1.38 dS m-1 in the surface layer and 1.19 dS m-1 in the subsurface, suggesting that these critical levels and limits can be used to evaluate the fertility of sandy soils cultivated with sugarcane in tropical regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K application increased soil and leaf K levels.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
application of Ke0
Outcome
soil and leaf K levelse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of K promoted increase in soil and leaf K levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K application increased productivity.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
application of Ke0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of K promoted increase in soil and leaf K levels, increasing also both productivity and the sugar concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K application increased sugar concentration.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
application of Ke0
Outcome
sugar concentratione0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of K promoted increase in soil and leaf K levels, increasing also both productivity and the sugar concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum agronomic efficiency occurred at 150 kg ha-1 K2O and 116 Mg ha-1 production.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
150 kg ha-1 of K2Oe0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
116 Mg ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The dose of maximum agronomic efficiency was 150 kg ha-1 of K2O and production of 116 Mg ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K doses above 200 kg ha-1 decreased productivity through soil salinity.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
High doses of K (> 200 kg ha-1 of K2O)e0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
elevated soil salinitye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“High doses of K (> 200 kg ha-1 of K2O) decreased the productivity due to elevated soil salinity by the application of K fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil K critical level was 0.18 cmolc dm-3.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
critical levels of Ke0
Value
0.18 cmolc dm-3e0
Setting
soile0

Verbatim

e0

“The critical levels of K were 0.18 cmolc dm-3 in the soil and 9.53 g kg-1 in the plant and were associated with low doses of K (< 25 kg ha-1 of K2O).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plant K critical level was 9.53 g kg-1.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
critical levels of Ke0
Value
9.53 g kg-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The critical levels of K were 0.18 cmolc dm-3 in the soil and 9.53 g kg-1 in the plant and were associated with low doses of K (< 25 kg ha-1 of K2O).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface salinity at 1.38 dS m-1 reduced productivity.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.38 dS m-1e0
Setting
surface layere0

Verbatim

e0

“The salinity limits that reduced productivity were 1.38 dS m-1 in the surface layer and 1.19 dS m-1 in the subsurface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface salinity at 1.19 dS m-1 reduced productivity.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.19 dS m-1e0
Setting
subsurfacee0

Verbatim

e0

“The salinity limits that reduced productivity were 1.38 dS m-1 in the surface layer and 1.19 dS m-1 in the subsurface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest the critical levels and salinity limits for assessing sandy soil fertility.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
evaluate the fertility of sandy soilse0
Setting
tropical regionse0

Verbatim

e0

“suggesting that these critical levels and limits can be used to evaluate the fertility of sandy soils cultivated with sugarcane in tropical regions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1448 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

57 papers: 50 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.