Paper · 2019 · Ciência e Agrotecnologia

Potential utilization of spent Agaricus bisporus mushroom substrate for seedling production and organic fertilizer in tomato cultivation

Carolina Figueiredo Collela; Lívia Martinez Abreu Soares Costa; Tatiana Silveira Junqueira de Moraes; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT The production of Agaricus bisporus results in significant residual material after cultivation. Due to its physical properties and nutrient content Spent Mushroom Substrate (SMS) has great potential for use in agriculture. Our study evaluated the feasibility of using SMS as an alternative substrate for the production of Paronset® hybrid tomato seedlings and as an organic fertilizer in its production. To conduct the fruit production experiment, the plots consisted of three types of fertilizers (SMS of A. bisporus, NPK and bovine manure) with four replications. The seedlings produced in the SMS presented higher rates of germination time and speeds, and stood out from the other substrates in the evaluation of seedling quality. In the tomato fruit production phase, the average production of the plants originating from the SMS was 20% higher than the seedlings from the commercial substrate. The plants cultivated with the SMS presented higher production than the plants cultivated with bovine manure incorporated the soil. According to our results, The SMS was as good as the commercial substrates tested. Therefore, the SMS can be recommended for the growth and nutrition of seedling production and denotes potential viability for use in the tomato production cycle in its different phases.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SMS seedlings had higher germination-time and speed rates than other substrates.

Treatment
SMSe0
Outcome
germination time and speedse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“The seedlings produced in the SMS presented higher rates of germination time and speeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SMS seedlings stood out in seedling quality evaluation.

Treatment
SMSe1
Outcome
seedling qualitye0
Direction
stood oute0
Comparator
other substratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“stood out from the other substrates in the evaluation of seedling quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–741 · show in text ↑
e1

“seedlings produced in the SMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants from SMS seedlings produced 20% more fruit than those from commercial substrate seedlings.

Treatment
SMSe0
Outcome
average productione0
Direction
highere0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
commercial substratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“average production of the plants originating from the SMS was 20% higher than the seedlings from the commercial substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SMS fertilization produced more than bovine manure.

Treatment
SMSe0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
bovine manuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plants cultivated with the SMS presented higher production than the plants cultivated with bovine manure incorporated the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SMS performed as well as tested commercial substrates.

Treatment
SMSe0
Outcome
as good ase0
Direction
as good ase0
Comparator
commercial substratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“The SMS was as good as the commercial substrates tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1121 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend SMS for tomato seedling growth and nutrition.

Outcome
growth and nutrition of seedling productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“the SMS can be recommended for the growth and nutrition of seedling production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1212 · show in text ↑

growing medium · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 20 positive, 9 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

growing medium · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 112 positive, 29 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

growing medium · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

169 papers: 126 positive, 43 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

165 papers more in this group

See all 169 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.