Paper · 2023 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Paddy and maize straw-based media as an alternative for cocopeat in soilless cultivation

Rakesh Sharda; Angrej Singh; Kusum Pandey

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of different locally available organic wastes like briquettes, biochar, paddy, and maize straw in combination with coco peat used as standard soilless growing media, for growing tomato under poly nethouse. The experiment layout was completely randomized design with three replications comprising of eleven treatments viz. 100% cocopeat (T1), 25% paddy straw + 75% cocopeat (T2), 50% paddy straw + 50% cocopeat (T3), 75% paddy straw + 25% cocopeat (T4), 100% straw (T5), 50% briquette + 50% cocopeat (T6), 100% briquettes (T7), 25% biochar + 75% cocopeat (T8), 50% biochar + 50% cocopeat (T9), 75% biochar + 25% cocopeat (T10), and 100% biochar (T11) during first season. During second year, treatments were modified to 25% briquette + 75% cocopeat (T7), 25% maize straw + 25% paddy straw + 50% cocopeat (T8), 25% maize straw + 50% paddy straw + 25% cocopeat (T9), 50% maize straw + 50% cocopeat (T10), 100% maize straw (T11), and 100% soil (T12). The results revealed that maximum fruit yield per plant recorded in the treatment T1 (100% cocopeat) was significantly higher as compared to all other treatments during the first year of study. However, during the second year, it was statistically at par with T6 and T7 but significantly higher as compared to other treatments. When 25 to 50% substitution of cocopeat was done with paddy straw briquettes or 25% paddy straw + 75% cocopeat was used, the quality parameters were comparable to 100% cococpeat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

First year fruit yield per plant was significantly higher with 100% cocopeat than all other treatments.

Treatment
T1 (100% cocopeat)e0
Outcome
fruit yield per plante0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
first year of studye0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“tomato under poly nethouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–262 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum fruit yield per plant recorded in the treatment T1 (100% cocopeat) was significantly higher as compared to all other treatments during the first year of study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Second year 100% cocopeat yield was statistically at par with T6 and T7.

Treatment
T1e2
Outcome
fruit yield per plante2
Direction
statistically at pare0
Comparator
T6 and T7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“tomato under poly nethouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–262 · show in text ↑
e0

“during the second year, it was statistically at par with T6 and T7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1274 · show in text ↑
e2

“fruit yield per plant recorded in the treatment T1 (100% cocopeat)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Second year 100% cocopeat yield was significantly higher than other treatments.

Treatment
T1e2
Outcome
fruit yield per plante2
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“tomato under poly nethouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–262 · show in text ↑
e0

“during the second year, it was statistically at par with T6 and T7 but significantly higher as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1331 · show in text ↑
e2

“fruit yield per plant recorded in the treatment T1 (100% cocopeat)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substituting 25 to 50% cocopeat with paddy straw briquettes gave quality comparable to 100% cocopeat.

Treatment
25 to 50% substitution of cocopeat was done with paddy straw briquettese0
Outcome
quality parameterse0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
100% cococpeate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“tomato under poly nethouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–262 · show in text ↑
e0

“25 to 50% substitution of cocopeat was done with paddy straw briquettes or 25% paddy straw + 75% cocopeat was used, the quality parameters were comparable to 100% cococpeat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 25% paddy straw and 75% cocopeat mix gave quality comparable to 100% cocopeat.

Treatment
25% paddy straw + 75% cocopeate0
Outcome
quality parameterse0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
100% cococpeate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“tomato under poly nethouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–262 · show in text ↑
e0

“25% paddy straw + 75% cocopeat was used, the quality parameters were comparable to 100% cococpeat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1510 · show in text ↑

growing medium · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 20 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

growing medium · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 112 positive, 29 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.