Paper · 2019 · Nematology

The root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, profoundly affects the production of popular biofortified cassava cultivars

Aminat Korede Akinsanya; Steve Olaoluwa Afolami; Peter Kulakow; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Summary Despite being the single largest cassava-producing country, yields in Nigeria remain consistently poor and among the lowest. Regionally, yields are also particularly low across Africa. Pests and pathogens, including plant-parasitic nematodes, play an important role in this current yield deficit. African countries are not only faced with the problem of food security but also that of nutritional deficiency, due to limited micronutrients in the diet. In this study, six biofortified cultivars were evaluated for their response to inoculation with approximately 30 000 root-knot nematode ( Meloidogyne incognita ) eggs in 30 l pots in Nigeria. All cassava cultivars proved highly susceptible to M. incognita infection after 6 months, with nematode reproduction factor ranging from 7.0 to 44.8. Galling was common on feeder roots and gall index scores were recorded between 4 to 5 (on a scale of 1-5 where 5 ⩽ 100 galls). Meloidogyne incognita infection significantly reduced plant height, stem girth, fresh plant mass, fresh storage root number and storage root weight. Percentage yield loss of between 41.8-88.4% was recorded in M. incognita -infected plants compared with non-infected controls. Although M. incognita reduced storage root weight, it did not necessarily affect the nutritional quality (total carotenoid) or dry weight percentage of the biofortified cassava cultivars. Total carotenoid and dry weight contents of the control cultivar were similar to some of the biofortified cultivars. The high susceptibility of the biofortified cassava cultivars to M. incognita infection indicates that substantial yield losses are likely being experienced by farmers, as this nematode pest is prevalent across sub-Saharan Africa and the tropics.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All biofortified cassava cultivars were highly susceptible to M. incognita infection.

Taxon
cassava cultivarsManihot esculentae1
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Outcome
highly susceptible to M. incognita infectione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“profoundly affects the production of popular biofortified cassava cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“All cassava cultivars proved highly susceptible to M. incognita infection after 6 months, with nematode reproduction factor ranging from 7.0 to 44.8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. incognita infection gave nematode reproduction factors of 7.0 to 44.8 in cassava cultivars.

Taxon
cassava cultivarsManihot esculentae1
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Outcome
nematode reproduction factore1
Value
7.0 to 44.8e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“profoundly affects the production of popular biofortified cassava cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“All cassava cultivars proved highly susceptible to M. incognita infection after 6 months, with nematode reproduction factor ranging from 7.0 to 44.8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Galling on feeder roots of cassava had gall index scores between 4 and 5.

Organ / stage
feeder rootse2
Outcome
gall index scorese2
Value
between 4 to 5e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“profoundly affects the production of popular biofortified cassava cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–122 · show in text ↑
e2

“Galling was common on feeder roots and gall index scores were recorded between 4 to 5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

M. incognita infection significantly reduced plant height, stem girth and fresh plant mass of cassava.

Treatment
Meloidogyne incognita infectione3
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae3pest
Outcome
plant height, stem girth, fresh plant masse3
Direction
significantly reducede3
Comparator
non-infected controlse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“profoundly affects the production of popular biofortified cassava cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–122 · show in text ↑
e3

“Meloidogyne incognita infection significantly reduced plant height, stem girth, fresh plant mass, fresh storage root number and storage root weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1076 · show in text ↑
e4

“Percentage yield loss of between 41.8-88.4% was recorded in M. incognita -infected plants compared with non-infected controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

M. incognita infection significantly reduced fresh storage root number and storage root weight of cassava.

Treatment
Meloidogyne incognita infectione3
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae3pest
Outcome
fresh storage root number and storage root weighte3
Direction
significantly reducede3
Comparator
non-infected controlse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“profoundly affects the production of popular biofortified cassava cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–122 · show in text ↑
e3

“Meloidogyne incognita infection significantly reduced plant height, stem girth, fresh plant mass, fresh storage root number and storage root weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1076 · show in text ↑
e4

“Percentage yield loss of between 41.8-88.4% was recorded in M. incognita -infected plants compared with non-infected controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. incognita-infected cassava plants lost 41.8-88.4% yield relative to non-infected controls.

Treatment
M. incognita -infectede4
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae4pest
Outcome
Percentage yield losse4
Direction
increaseinferrede4
Value
41.8-88.4%e4
Comparator
non-infected controlse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“profoundly affects the production of popular biofortified cassava cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–122 · show in text ↑
e4

“Percentage yield loss of between 41.8-88.4% was recorded in M. incognita -infected plants compared with non-infected controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. incognita did not necessarily affect total carotenoid or dry weight percentage of biofortified cassava.

Taxon
biofortified cassava cultivarse5
Treatment
M. incognitae5
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae5pest
Outcome
nutritional quality (total carotenoid) or dry weight percentagee5
Direction
did not necessarily affecte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“profoundly affects the production of popular biofortified cassava cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–122 · show in text ↑
e5

“Although M. incognita reduced storage root weight, it did not necessarily affect the nutritional quality (total carotenoid) or dry weight percentage of the biofortified cassava cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1391 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total carotenoid and dry weight of the control cultivar were similar to some biofortified cassava cultivars.

Outcome
Total carotenoid and dry weight contentse6
Qualifier
were similar to some of the biofortified cultivarse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“profoundly affects the production of popular biofortified cassava cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–122 · show in text ↑
e6

“Total carotenoid and dry weight contents of the control cultivar were similar to some of the biofortified cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1508 · show in text ↑
Observationhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Substantial cassava yield losses are likely under M. incognita infection in farmers fields.

Taxon
biofortified cassava cultivarse7
Outcome
substantial yield lossese7

Verbatim

t0

“profoundly affects the production of popular biofortified cassava cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–122 · show in text ↑
e7

“The high susceptibility of the biofortified cassava cultivars to M. incognita infection indicates that substantial yield losses are likely being experienced by farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1677 · show in text ↑

Meloidogyne incognita · growth · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

infection · growth · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.