Abstract
Present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of different chemicals to improve the yield and quality of litchi and for minimizing the post harvest and physiological disorders in fruits. Calcium nitrate, calcium chloride, boric acid, salicylic acid and humic acid were applied as preharvest foliar spray. Results showed that fruit cracking (11.03%) was reduced by boric acid (0.1 %). Fruit yield (90.44 kg/tree), fruit weight (25.37 g), fruit volume (23.90 ml), pulp weight (17.42 g) and pulp: peel ratio (8.90) were maximum with calcium chloride (0.5%). Humic acid @ 0.2% was better for higher total sugars (16.31%). Boric acid @ 0.1% was better for higher reducing sugars (12.76%). Calcium nitrate (0.5%) was better for higher non reducing sugars (4.93%). Humic acid @ 0.4% was better for higher TSS: acid ratio (57.97).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Boric acid at 0.1% reduced fruit cracking to 11.03%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“fruit cracking (11.03%) was reduced by boric acid (0.1 %)”
t0“litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium chloride at 0.5% gave maximum fruit yield of 90.44 kg/tree.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fruit yield (90.44 kg/tree), fruit weight (25.37 g), fruit volume (23.90 ml), pulp weight (17.42 g) and pulp: peel ratio (8.90) were maximum with calcium chloride (0.5%).”
t0“litchi”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium chloride gave maximum fruit weight of 25.37 g.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“fruit weight (25.37 g), fruit volume (23.90 ml), pulp weight (17.42 g) and pulp: peel ratio (8.90) were maximum with calcium chloride (0.5%)”
t0“litchi”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium chloride gave maximum fruit volume of 23.90 ml.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“fruit volume (23.90 ml), pulp weight (17.42 g) and pulp: peel ratio (8.90) were maximum with calcium chloride (0.5%)”
t0“litchi”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium chloride gave maximum pulp weight of 17.42 g.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“pulp weight (17.42 g) and pulp: peel ratio (8.90) were maximum with calcium chloride (0.5%)”
t0“litchi”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium chloride gave maximum pulp to peel ratio of 8.90.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“pulp: peel ratio (8.90) were maximum with calcium chloride (0.5%)”
t0“litchi”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid at 0.2% gave higher total sugars of 16.31%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Humic acid @ 0.2% was better for higher total sugars (16.31%)”
t0“litchi”
Claim · model-written summary
Boric acid at 0.1% gave higher reducing sugars of 12.76%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Boric acid @ 0.1% was better for higher reducing sugars (12.76%)”
t0“litchi”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium nitrate at 0.5% gave higher non reducing sugars of 4.93%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Calcium nitrate (0.5%) was better for higher non reducing sugars (4.93%)”
t0“litchi”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid at 0.4% gave higher TSS to acid ratio of 57.97.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Humic acid @ 0.4% was better for higher TSS: acid ratio (57.97)”
t0“litchi”
The same questions in other papers
boric acid · quality: sugar starch · LitchiResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
calcium nitrate · quality: sugar starch · LitchiResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
calcium chloride dihydrate · yield · LitchiResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.