Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of different chemicals on litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) cv. Rose Scented.

Nitin Panwar; Pradumn Narain; Jitendra Kumar; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of different chemicals to improve the yield and quality of litchi and for minimizing the post harvest and physiological disorders in fruits. Calcium nitrate, calcium chloride, boric acid, salicylic acid and humic acid were applied as preharvest foliar spray. Results showed that fruit cracking (11.03%) was reduced by boric acid (0.1 %). Fruit yield (90.44 kg/tree), fruit weight (25.37 g), fruit volume (23.90 ml), pulp weight (17.42 g) and pulp: peel ratio (8.90) were maximum with calcium chloride (0.5%). Humic acid @ 0.2% was better for higher total sugars (16.31%). Boric acid @ 0.1% was better for higher reducing sugars (12.76%). Calcium nitrate (0.5%) was better for higher non reducing sugars (4.93%). Humic acid @ 0.4% was better for higher TSS: acid ratio (57.97).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boric acid at 0.1% reduced fruit cracking to 11.03%.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
boric acid (0.1 %)e0
Outcome
fruit crackinge0
Direction
reducede0
Value
11.03%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit cracking (11.03%) was reduced by boric acid (0.1 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–387 · show in text ↑
t0

“litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium chloride at 0.5% gave maximum fruit yield of 90.44 kg/tree.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
calcium chloride (0.5%)e0
Outcome
Fruit yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
90.44 kg/treee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield (90.44 kg/tree), fruit weight (25.37 g), fruit volume (23.90 ml), pulp weight (17.42 g) and pulp: peel ratio (8.90) were maximum with calcium chloride (0.5%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–559 · show in text ↑
t0

“litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium chloride gave maximum fruit weight of 25.37 g.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
calcium chloride (0.5%)e0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
25.37 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit weight (25.37 g), fruit volume (23.90 ml), pulp weight (17.42 g) and pulp: peel ratio (8.90) were maximum with calcium chloride (0.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium chloride gave maximum fruit volume of 23.90 ml.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
calcium chloride (0.5%)e0
Outcome
fruit volumee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
23.90 mle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit volume (23.90 ml), pulp weight (17.42 g) and pulp: peel ratio (8.90) were maximum with calcium chloride (0.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium chloride gave maximum pulp weight of 17.42 g.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
calcium chloride (0.5%)e0
Outcome
pulp weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
17.42 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pulp weight (17.42 g) and pulp: peel ratio (8.90) were maximum with calcium chloride (0.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium chloride gave maximum pulp to peel ratio of 8.90.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
calcium chloride (0.5%)e0
Outcome
pulp: peel ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
8.90e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pulp: peel ratio (8.90) were maximum with calcium chloride (0.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid at 0.2% gave higher total sugars of 16.31%.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
Humic acid @ 0.2%e0
Outcome
total sugarse0
Direction
highere0
Value
16.31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Humic acid @ 0.2% was better for higher total sugars (16.31%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–621 · show in text ↑
t0

“litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boric acid at 0.1% gave higher reducing sugars of 12.76%.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
Boric acid @ 0.1%e0
Outcome
reducing sugarse0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.76%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Boric acid @ 0.1% was better for higher reducing sugars (12.76%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate at 0.5% gave higher non reducing sugars of 4.93%.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
Calcium nitrate (0.5%)e0
Outcome
non reducing sugarse0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.93%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium nitrate (0.5%) was better for higher non reducing sugars (4.93%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid at 0.4% gave higher TSS to acid ratio of 57.97.

Taxon
litchiLitchit0
Treatment
Humic acid @ 0.4%e0
Outcome
TSS: acid ratioe0
Direction
bettere0
Value
57.97e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Litchi
Litchi · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Luc Viatour · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Humic acid @ 0.4% was better for higher TSS: acid ratio (57.97)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“litchi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑

boric acid · quality: sugar starch · LitchiResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium nitrate · quality: sugar starch · LitchiResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · yield · LitchiResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.