Paper · 2019 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Enhancing Pulse Productivity under Rice Based Production System Through Chickpea and Lentil Based Intercropping Systems in North East India

N Anando Singh; Sakhen Sorokhaibam; Sonika Yumnam; et al.

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) and winter (rabi) seasons of 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 at Imphal, Manipur, to study the performance of intercropping chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) with linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) and Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) czernj. and cosson] under 2 varying preceding kharif lowland rice (Oryza sativa L) crop durations and also to evaluate the system productivity and profitability. Planting of medium duration rice variety enhanced growth and yield of rabi crops resulting in increase in system productivity in terms of rice equivalent yield (REY) and production efficiency (PE) by 5.4 %, and 14.5%, respectively over planting of late duration rice variety. Seed and biological yields of chickpea, lentil, Indian mustard and linseed were higher in sole cropping than in intercropping systems. Indian mustard and linseed were found dominant and aggressive as compared to chickpea and lentil. Chickpea and Indian mustard intercropping under 4:2 ratio proved more remunerative and recorded higher yield advantage than either of chickpea and linseed or lentil and Indian mustard intercropping as judged by REY (9.7 tonnes/ha), crop productivity (39.9 kg/ha/ day) and net return (` 81,168/ha). Land equivalent ratio (LER) of chickpea with Indian mustard (1.10) remained at par with intercropping chickpea with linseed (1.17), however, lentil intercropped with Indian mustard had less than unity LER of 0.87.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium duration rice increased rice equivalent yield by 5.4% over late duration rice.

Treatment
medium duration rice varietye0
Outcome
rice equivalent yield (REY)e0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.4 %e0
Comparator
late duration rice varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting of medium duration rice variety enhanced growth and yield of rabi crops resulting in increase in system productivity in terms of rice equivalent yield (REY) and production efficiency (PE) by 5.4 %, and 14.5%, respectively over planting of late duration rice variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium duration rice increased production efficiency by 14.5% over late duration rice.

Treatment
medium duration rice varietye0
Outcome
production efficiency (PE)e0
Direction
increasee0
Value
14.5%e0
Comparator
late duration rice varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting of medium duration rice variety enhanced growth and yield of rabi crops resulting in increase in system productivity in terms of rice equivalent yield (REY) and production efficiency (PE) by 5.4 %, and 14.5%, respectively over planting of late duration rice variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole cropping produced higher seed and biological yields than intercropping for chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
sole croppinge0
Outcome
Seed and biological yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intercropping systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed and biological yields of chickpea, lentil, Indian mustard and linseed were higher in sole cropping than in intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole cropping produced higher seed and biological yields than intercropping for lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
sole croppinge0
Outcome
Seed and biological yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intercropping systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed and biological yields of chickpea, lentil, Indian mustard and linseed were higher in sole cropping than in intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole cropping produced higher seed and biological yields than intercropping for Indian mustard.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
sole croppinge0
Outcome
Seed and biological yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intercropping systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed and biological yields of chickpea, lentil, Indian mustard and linseed were higher in sole cropping than in intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole cropping produced higher seed and biological yields than intercropping for linseed.

Taxon
linseede0
Treatment
sole croppinge0
Outcome
Seed and biological yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intercropping systemse0

Verbatim

e0

“Seed and biological yields of chickpea, lentil, Indian mustard and linseed were higher in sole cropping than in intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–890 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indian mustard was dominant and aggressive relative to chickpea and lentil.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Outcome
dominant and aggressivee0
Direction
dominante0
Comparator
chickpea and lentile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indian mustard and linseed were found dominant and aggressive as compared to chickpea and lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–988 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linseed was dominant and aggressive relative to chickpea and lentil.

Taxon
linseede0
Outcome
dominant and aggressivee0
Direction
dominante0
Comparator
chickpea and lentile0

Verbatim

e0

“Indian mustard and linseed were found dominant and aggressive as compared to chickpea and lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea–Indian mustard intercropping at 4:2 had greater rice equivalent yield, 9.7 tonnes/ha, than the other tested intercrops.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Chickpea and Indian mustard intercropping under 4:2 ratioe0
Outcome
REYe0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.7 tonnes/hae0
Comparator
chickpea and linseed or lentil and Indian mustard intercroppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chickpea and Indian mustard intercropping under 4:2 ratio proved more remunerative and recorded higher yield advantage than either of chickpea and linseed or lentil and Indian mustard intercropping as judged by REY (9.7 tonnes/ha), crop productivity (39.9 kg/ha/ day) and net return (` 81,168/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1286 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea–Indian mustard intercropping at 4:2 had crop productivity of 39.9 kg/ha/day.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Chickpea and Indian mustard intercropping under 4:2 ratioe0
Outcome
crop productivitye0
Value
39.9 kg/ha/ daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chickpea and Indian mustard intercropping under 4:2 ratio proved more remunerative and recorded higher yield advantage than either of chickpea and linseed or lentil and Indian mustard intercropping as judged by REY (9.7 tonnes/ha), crop productivity (39.9 kg/ha/ day) and net return (` 81,168/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1286 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea–Indian mustard intercropping at 4:2 had net return of ` 81,168/ha.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Chickpea and Indian mustard intercropping under 4:2 ratioe0
Outcome
net returne0
Value
` 81,168/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chickpea and Indian mustard intercropping under 4:2 ratio proved more remunerative and recorded higher yield advantage than either of chickpea and linseed or lentil and Indian mustard intercropping as judged by REY (9.7 tonnes/ha), crop productivity (39.9 kg/ha/ day) and net return (` 81,168/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1286 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea with Indian mustard had LER 1.10, at par with chickpea with linseed at 1.17.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Indian mustarde0
Outcome
Land equivalent ratio (LER)e0
Direction
at pare0
Value
1.10e0
Qualifier
1.17e0
Comparator
linseede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Land equivalent ratio (LER) of chickpea with Indian mustard (1.10) remained at par with intercropping chickpea with linseed (1.17)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1418 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil with Indian mustard had LER below unity, 0.87.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Indian mustarde0
Outcome
LERe0
Direction
less than unitye0
Value
0.87e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lentil intercropped with Indian mustard had less than unity LER of 0.87”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1500 · show in text ↑

Brassica juncea · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

intercropping · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 6 positive, 9 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

intercropping · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 23 positive, 11 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 48 positive, 15 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.