Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Nutrient uptake and yield of green gram (Vigna radiata L.) as influenced by phosphorus fertilization, organic manures and biofertilizers

Gurulingaiah Bhavya; K. Chandra Shaker; G. Jayasree; et al.

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted during kharif, 2016 to study the effects of phosphorus levels, biofertilizers (Phosphate solubilising bacteria) and organic manures (vermicompost) on yield, nutrient concentration and their uptake at flowering and harvest of green gram. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications having 12 treatment combinations viz. 3 levels of phosphorus (0, 75 and 100 % RDP) and its integration with PSB (500 g ha-1seed) and vermicompost (5 t ha-1). Experimental results revealed that grain yield and nutrient uptakes significantly influenced by phosphorus, vermicompost and PSB application. Application of higher dose of phosphorus along with PSB and vermicompost (100 % RDP + Vermicompost+ Phosphate solubilising bacteria) proved to be the best in improving the seed yield (1033.33 kg ha-1). Application of inorganic P fertilizers, organic manures and PSB markedly influenced the nutrient concentration and their uptake. Results showed that application of vermicompost at 5 t ha-1, seed inoculation with PSB and 100% RDP significantly increased the N, P, K and S concentration in grain, haulm and their uptake by greengram.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined phosphorus, vermicompost and phosphate solubilising bacteria gave the best green gram seed yield of 1033.33 kg ha-1.

Treatment
100 % RDP + Vermicompost+ Phosphate solubilising bacteriae0
Interactor
Phosphate solubilising bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
beste0
Value
1033.33 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of higher dose of phosphorus along with PSB and vermicompost (100 % RDP + Vermicompost+ Phosphate solubilising bacteria) proved to be the best in improving the seed yield (1033.33 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment significantly increased N, P and K concentration in green gram grain and haulm.

Organ / stage
grain, haulme0
Treatment
vermicompost at 5 t ha-1, seed inoculation with PSB and 100% RDPe0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
concentration in grain, haulme0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of vermicompost at 5 t ha-1, seed inoculation with PSB and 100% RDP significantly increased the N, P, K and S concentration in grain, haulm and their uptake by greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment significantly increased S concentration in green gram grain and haulm.

Treatment
vermicompost at 5 t ha-1, seed inoculation with PSB and 100% RDPe0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
S concentration in grain, haulme0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of vermicompost at 5 t ha-1, seed inoculation with PSB and 100% RDP significantly increased the N, P, K and S concentration in grain, haulm and their uptake by greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment significantly increased nutrient uptake by green gram.

Treatment
vermicompost at 5 t ha-1, seed inoculation with PSB and 100% RDPe0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
their uptake by greengrame0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of vermicompost at 5 t ha-1, seed inoculation with PSB and 100% RDP significantly increased the N, P, K and S concentration in grain, haulm and their uptake by greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1179 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

179 papers: 175 positive, 4 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

175 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 60 positive, 1 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 76 positive, 3 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 179 positive, 5 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.