Paper · 2020 · Journal of Crop Improvement

Scion-rootstock interactions in grafted tea at nursery and field levels

Ranjith Karunakaran; Saravanan Marimuthu; Victor J. Ilango R

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Grafting of fresh tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) cuttings in the nursery offers the possibility to raise composite plants with superior traits. To increase the land productivity, grafted tea plants are greatly preferred in replanting programs in South India. Hence, the present study was conducted to widen the choice of compatible grafts and to know the consistency in nursery and field performances of grafted tea plants. The clone TRF-4 was used as scion for grafting on the rootstock clones UPASI-2, UPASI-6, UPASI-9, and UPASI-26. Nursery assessments showed that all grafted plants produced more vigorous composite plants than self-rooted TRF-4. However, field assessment indicated significant effects of stock-scion interaction on the performance of grafted plants. Significant increases in yield and canopy spread were noted when TRF-4 was grafted on UPASI-9, UPASI-2 and UPASI-26. However, composite plants of TRF-4 grafted on the rootstocks of UPASI-6 recorded lower field survival and yields compared to the self-rooted TRF-4. This result suggests that nursery performance is not a reliable index to judge the field performance of grafted plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All grafted tea plants were more vigorous in the nursery than self-rooted TRF-4.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
all grafted plantse0
Outcome
vigorous composite plantse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
self-rooted TRF-4e0

Verbatim

e0

“all grafted plants produced more vigorous composite plants than self-rooted TRF-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stock-scion interaction significantly affected grafted plant field performance.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
stock-scion interactione0
Outcome
performance of grafted plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“field assessment indicated significant effects of stock-scion interaction on the performance of grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

TRF-4 grafted on UPASI-9, UPASI-2 and UPASI-26 had significantly increased yield and canopy spread.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
TRF-4 was grafted on UPASI-9, UPASI-2 and UPASI-26e0
Outcome
yield and canopy spreade0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increases in yield and canopy spread were noted when TRF-4 was grafted on UPASI-9, UPASI-2 and UPASI-26”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRF-4 grafted on UPASI-6 had lower field survival and yields than self-rooted TRF-4.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
TRF-4 grafted on the rootstocks of UPASI-6e0
Outcome
field survival and yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
self-rooted TRF-4e0

Verbatim

e0

“TRF-4 grafted on the rootstocks of UPASI-6 recorded lower field survival and yields compared to the self-rooted TRF-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–43 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nursery performance was not a reliable index of grafted plant field performance.

Taxon
teat0
Outcome
field performance of grafted plantse0
Direction
not a reliable indexe0
Comparator
nursery performancee0

Verbatim

e0

“nursery performance is not a reliable index to judge the field performance of grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–43 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.