Paper · 2020 · PLoS ONE

Concomitant phytonutrient and transcriptome analysis of mature fruit and leaf tissues of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Oregon Spring) grown using organic and conventional fertilizer

Richard M. Sharpe; Luke Gustafson; Seanna Hewitt; et al.

7
claims
20
verbatim quotes
25
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Enhanced levels of antioxidants, phenolic compounds, carotenoids and vitamin C have been reported for several crops grown under organic fertilizer, albeit with yield penalties. As organic agricultural practices continue to grow and find favor it is critical to gain an understanding of the molecular underpinnings of the factors that limit the yields in organically farmed crops. Concomitant phytochemical and transcriptomic analysis was performed on mature fruit and leaf tissues derived from Solanum lycopersicum L. 'Oregon Spring' grown under organic and conventional fertilizer conditions to evaluate the following hypotheses. 1. Organic soil fertilizer management results in greater allocation of photosynthetically derived resources to the synthesis of secondary metabolites than to plant growth, and 2. Genes involved in changes in the accumulation of phytonutrients under organic fertilizer regime will exhibit differential expression, and that the growth under different fertilizer treatments will elicit a differential response from the tomato genome. Both these hypotheses were supported, suggesting an adjustment of the metabolic and genomic activity of the plant in response to different fertilizers. Organic fertilizer treatment showed an activation of photoinhibitory processes through differential activation of nitrogen transport and assimilation genes resulting in higher accumulation of phytonutrients. This information can be used to identify alleles for breeding crops that allow for efficient utilization of organic inputs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer supported greater allocation of photosynthetic resources to secondary metabolites than to growth.

Material
Oregon Springt0
Treatment
Organic soil fertilizer managemente0
Outcome
allocation of photosynthetically derived resources to the synthesis of secondary metabolitese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
plant growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic soil fertilizer management results in greater allocation of photosynthetically derived resources to the synthesis of secondary metabolites than to plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–801 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both these hypotheses were supported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Oregon Spring)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–139 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genes involved in phytonutrient accumulation showed differential expression under organic fertilizer.

Material
Oregon Springt0
Treatment
organic fertilizer regimee0
Gene
Genes involved in changes in the accumulation of phytonutrientse0
Outcome
differential expressione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genes involved in changes in the accumulation of phytonutrients under organic fertilizer regime will exhibit differential expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–942 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both these hypotheses were supported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Oregon Spring)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–139 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different fertilizer treatments elicited differential tomato genomic responses.

Material
Oregon Springt0
Treatment
different fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
differential response from the tomato genomee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth under different fertilizer treatments will elicit a differential response from the tomato genome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both these hypotheses were supported”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Oregon Spring)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer activated photoinhibitory processes in tomato.

Material
Oregon Springt0
Treatment
Organic fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
activation of photoinhibitory processese0
Comparator
conventional fertilizert1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic fertilizer treatment showed an activation of photoinhibitory processes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Oregon Spring)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–139 · show in text ↑
t1

“organic and conventional fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer differentially activated nitrogen transport and assimilation genes.

Material
Oregon Springt0
Treatment
Organic fertilizer treatmente0
Gene
nitrogen transport and assimilation genese0
Outcome
differential activation of nitrogen transport and assimilation genese0
Comparator
conventional fertilizert1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic fertilizer treatment showed an activation of photoinhibitory processes through differential activation of nitrogen transport and assimilation genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Oregon Spring)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–139 · show in text ↑
t1

“organic and conventional fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer led to higher phytonutrient accumulation in tomato.

Material
Oregon Springt0
Treatment
Organic fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
accumulation of phytonutrientse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional fertilizert1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic fertilizer treatment showed an activation of photoinhibitory processes through differential activation of nitrogen transport and assimilation genes resulting in higher accumulation of phytonutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1420 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Oregon Spring)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–139 · show in text ↑
t1

“organic and conventional fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–187 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest using the findings to identify alleles for efficient use of organic inputs in breeding.

Material
Oregon Springt0
Outcome
identify alleles for breeding crops that allow for efficient utilization of organic inputse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This information can be used to identify alleles for breeding crops that allow for efficient utilization of organic inputs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1544 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Oregon Spring)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–139 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 107 positive, 20 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.