Paper · 2020 · Open Journal of Forestry

Growth Performance, Undergrowth Diversity and Carbon Sequestration Potentials of Tree Species Stand Combinations, Ghana

Samuel Novor; Simon Abugre

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The limited number of studies on mixed plantations makes it difficult to accurately predict success of mixed-species combination especially with regards to growth, undergrowth diversity and carbon sequestration potentials. This study therefore provides information on the effects of Ceiba pentandra, Terminalia superba, Cedrela odorata and Khaya anthotheca in three different stand combinations on growth, undergrowth diversity and carbon sequestration potential. A 15-year-old coupe of 32 ha of mixed tree species stand combinations was selected for the study. The coupe was stratified based on the species combinations. Nested sub-plots (25 m × 25 m) were randomly laid in different species stand combinations for growth data collection. In each nested sub-plot, 1 m × 1 m plots were also randomly laid for undergrowth diversity study. The results revealed that two species stand combination of Ceiba pentandra and Terminalia superba performed better in terms of growth, carbon sequestration and carbon content as compared to the other species stand combinations. The saplings on the other hand, were more diverse under the three species stand combination plots. Also, the effective number of species, species richness, evenness, and dominance were higher in the four species stand combination plots. Generally, Ceiba pentandra and Terminalia superba are compatible as it produced the highest growth and carbon sequestration potential.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ceiba pentandra and Terminalia superba stand combination performed better in growth, carbon sequestration and carbon content than other stand combinations.

Taxon
Ceiba pentandra and Terminalia superbaCeiba pentandraTerminalia superbae1
Treatment
two species stand combinatione1
Outcome
growth, carbon sequestration and carbon contente1
Direction
performed bettere1
Comparator
other species stand combinationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ceiba pentandra
Ceiba pentandra · TaxonBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Terminalia superba
Terminalia superba · TaxonOrbicule · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two species stand combination of Ceiba pentandra and Terminalia superba performed better in terms of growth, carbon sequestration and carbon content as compared to the other species stand combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1064 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saplings were more diverse under the three species stand combination plots.

Taxon
saplingse2
Treatment
three species stand combinatione2
Outcome
Undergrowth Diversityt0
Direction
more diversee2

Verbatim

e2

“The saplings on the other hand, were more diverse under the three species stand combination plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“Undergrowth Diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–41 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effective number of species, species richness and evenness were higher in the four species stand combination plots.

Taxon
Ceiba pentandra, Terminalia superba, Cedrela odorata and Khaya anthothecaCedrela odorataKhaya anthothecaCeiba pentandraTerminalia superbae0
Treatment
four species stand combinatione4
Outcome
effective number of species, species richness, evennesse4
Direction
highere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cedrela odorata
Cedrela odorata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Khaya anthotheca
Khaya anthotheca · TaxonAndrew massyn · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ceiba pentandra
Ceiba pentandra · TaxonBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Terminalia superba
Terminalia superba · TaxonOrbicule · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ceiba pentandra, Terminalia superba, Cedrela odorata and Khaya anthotheca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–356 · show in text ↑
e4

“the effective number of species, species richness, evenness, and dominance were higher in the four species stand combination plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1301 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dominance was higher in the four species stand combination plots.

Taxon
Ceiba pentandra, Terminalia superba, Cedrela odorata and Khaya anthothecaCedrela odorataKhaya anthothecaCeiba pentandraTerminalia superbae0
Treatment
four species stand combinatione4
Outcome
dominancee4
Direction
highere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cedrela odorata
Cedrela odorata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Khaya anthotheca
Khaya anthotheca · TaxonAndrew massyn · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ceiba pentandra
Ceiba pentandra · TaxonBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Terminalia superba
Terminalia superba · TaxonOrbicule · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ceiba pentandra, Terminalia superba, Cedrela odorata and Khaya anthotheca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–356 · show in text ↑
e4

“the effective number of species, species richness, evenness, and dominance were higher in the four species stand combination plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1301 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Ceiba pentandra and Terminalia superba are compatible for mixed planting.

Taxon
Ceiba pentandra and Terminalia superbaCeiba pentandraTerminalia superbae5
Outcome
compatiblee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ceiba pentandra
Ceiba pentandra · TaxonBurkhard Mücke · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Terminalia superba
Terminalia superba · TaxonOrbicule · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Generally, Ceiba pentandra and Terminalia superba are compatible as it produced the highest growth and carbon sequestration potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1436 · show in text ↑