Abstract
Cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) is the second most important virus disease after Cassava mosaic disease (CMD), infecting cassava (ManihotesculetaCrantz) in Africa.The disease is caused by two distinct viruses, Cassava brown streak virus [2, 3] and Ugandan Cassava brown streak virus (family, Potyviridae: genus, Ipomovirus).Transmission of CBSV from one plant to another is reported to occur through grafting CBSV-free with infected cuttings and subsequent dissemination by infected cuttings.The basic approach to control of CBSD is selecting planting material from symptomless mother plants.Graft inoculation is the most efficient and effective of the techniques for CBSD virus transmission and consequently cuttings are the most effective way of the disease spreading.In early 2000s, cassava root necrosis similar to those of CBSD were reported in western provinces of Democratic Republic of Congo (RDC) (Kinshasa and Kongo Central) and up to date PCR diagnoses did not detect any causal agent related to the observed symptoms and the disease which was still referred as 'CBSD-like disease'.Due to lack of molecular data and the similarity of root symptoms with CBSD, the existence of a virus has always been suspected to be the cause of CBSD-like propagation.Thus, 2 field experiments were proposed in order to verify the existence of a systematic transmission of a possible CBSD related virus, knowing that CBSD viruses are transmitted efficiently by cuttings.The first trial focused on the field evaluation of CBSDlike infected and apparently uninfected planting materials, while the second trial involved the importation of tanzanian CBSD resistant genotypes for evaluation in INERA Mvuazi research center under CBSD-like infection conditions.Results of the first trial did not show a systemic transmission of any CBSD-like pathogen while CBSD-resistant parents involved in the second trial all succumbed to CBSD-like disease.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
The field trial found no systemic transmission of any CBSD-like pathogen from CBSD-like infected planting material.
- Taxon
- cassava
Manihot esculentae0 - Treatment
- CBSDlike infectede1
- Interactor
- CBSD-like pathogene2pathogen
- Outcome
- systemic transmissione2
- Direction
- did not showe2
- Comparator
- apparently uninfected planting materialse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“infecting cassava (ManihotesculetaCrantz) in Africa”
e1“The first trial focused on the field evaluation of CBSDlike infected and apparently uninfected planting materials”
e2“Results of the first trial did not show a systemic transmission of any CBSD-like pathogen”
Claim · model-written summary
CBSD-resistant parents tested in the second trial all succumbed to CBSD-like disease.
- Taxon
- cassava
Manihot esculentae0 - Material
- CBSD-resistant parentse3
- Outcome
- CBSD-like diseasee3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“infecting cassava (ManihotesculetaCrantz) in Africa”
e3“CBSD-resistant parents involved in the second trial all succumbed to CBSD-like disease”
The same questions in other papers
infection · disease · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.