Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Response of different organic sources on growth, yield and quality of garden pea (Pisum sativum L. var. hortense) cv. Kashi Uday

Abhay Mankar; C Kumar; K Karuna; et al.

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Garden pea is highly nutritive vegetable, containing high percentage of proteins, carbohydrates, vitamins and minerals. As a leguminous vegetable it improves the soil fertility, yield levels and quality of produce of succeeding crops. The present investigation was carried out at Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour during the Rabi season of 2010-11 in R.B.D., replicated thrice and variety used was Kashi Uday. The treatments comprised different organic sources which includes FYM, poultry manures, Vermicompost, neem cake, mustard cake and chemical sources i.e. recommended dose N:P:K (50:60:60 kg/ha) and their combinations. Application of Poultry manures @ 3 t/ha. or FYM @ 5 t/ha + Poultry manures @ 1.5 t/ha was found to be most effective with respect to growth, yield attributes and yield of garden pea. However, for quality aspects like protein, sugars and shelling percentage, the use of Poultry manures @ 0.75 t/ha + Vermicompost @ 0.75 t/ha + Neem cake @ 0.5 t/ha + Mustard cake @ 0.25 t/ha gave better results in comparison to remaining treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure at 3 t/ha was most effective for garden pea growth, yield attributes and yield.

Taxon
garden peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
Material
Kashi Udayt0
Treatment
Poultry manures @ 3 t/hae0
Outcome
growth, yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
most effectivee0
Setting
Bihar Agricultural University, Saboure1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Poultry manures @ 3 t/ha. or FYM @ 5 t/ha + Poultry manures @ 1.5 t/ha was found to be most effective with respect to growth, yield attributes and yield of garden pea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–812 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kashi Uday”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 5 t/ha plus poultry manure at 1.5 t/ha was most effective for garden pea growth, yield attributes and yield.

Taxon
garden peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
Material
Kashi Udayt0
Treatment
FYM @ 5 t/ha + Poultry manures @ 1.5 t/hae0
Outcome
growth, yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Poultry manures @ 3 t/ha. or FYM @ 5 t/ha + Poultry manures @ 1.5 t/ha was found to be most effective with respect to growth, yield attributes and yield of garden pea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kashi Uday”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The four-source organic mixture gave better protein, sugars and shelling percentage than remaining treatments.

Taxon
garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
Material
Kashi Udayt1
Treatment
Poultry manures @ 0.75 t/ha + Vermicompost @ 0.75 t/ha + Neem cake @ 0.5 t/ha + Mustard cake @ 0.25 t/hae0
Outcome
protein, sugars and shelling percentagee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
remaining treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, for quality aspects like protein, sugars and shelling percentage, the use of Poultry manures @ 0.75 t/ha + Vermicompost @ 0.75 t/ha + Neem cake @ 0.5 t/ha + Mustard cake @ 0.25 t/ha gave better results in comparison to remaining treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“garden pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“Kashi Uday”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–128 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

botanical · quality: protein · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

240 papers: 216 positive, 24 negative or no effect

215 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.