Paper · 2020 · Crop Science

Enhanced photosynthesis, carbohydrates, and energy metabolism associated with chitosan‐induced drought tolerance in creeping bentgrass

Zhaoqiao Liu; Ting Liu; Linlin Liang; et al.

12
claims
36
verbatim quotes
44
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Chitosan (CTS) is involved in regulating tolerance to abiotic stress in plants. The objectives of this study were to examine whether exogenous application of CTS could improve drought tolerance of creeping bentgrass ( Agrostis stolonifera L.) and reveal CTS‐regulated mechanisms of drought tolerance. Antioxidant enzyme activities, photosynthesis, and metabolic pathways of amino acids, carbohydrates, and energy production were measured. Plants pretreated with or without 100 mg CTS L −1 were subjected to well‐watered or drought stress conditions for 14 d in growth chambers. The increase in endogenous CTS content by foliar spray of exogenous CTS significantly improved drought tolerance of creeping bentgrass as demonstrated by increased relative water content, cell membrane stability, photochemical efficiency, photosynthesis, and performance index on absorption basis under drought stress. The CTS application significantly reduced drought‐caused oxidative damage by enhancing total antioxidant capacity and activating superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase, and ascorbate peroxidase. During drought stress, pretreatment with CTS promoted water use efficiency, carbohydrate (sucrose and glucose) accumulation, energy production, and metabolic homeostasis. Chitosan treatment did not have an effect on proline accumulation and metabolism. Improved γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) accumulation, pyruvic acid, and chlorophyll content in leaves were found due to CTS treatment under drought stress. Results indicate that the CTS plays a positive role in regulating drought tolerance of creeping bentgrass by altering antioxidant, energy supply, and metabolic homeostasis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar CTS increased endogenous CTS content.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
CTSe1
Outcome
endogenous CTS contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increase in endogenous CTS content by foliar spray of exogenous CTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–658 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in endogenous CTS content by foliar spray of exogenous CTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS increased relative water content and cell membrane stability under drought.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
CTSe1
Outcome
relative water content, cell membrane stabilitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly improved drought tolerance of creeping bentgrass as demonstrated by increased relative water content, cell membrane stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–798 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in endogenous CTS content by foliar spray of exogenous CTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS increased photochemical efficiency, photosynthesis and absorption performance index under drought.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
CTSe1
Outcome
photochemical efficiency, photosynthesis, and performance index on absorption basise0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“increased relative water content, cell membrane stability, photochemical efficiency, photosynthesis, and performance index on absorption basis under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–904 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in endogenous CTS content by foliar spray of exogenous CTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS reduced drought oxidative damage.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
CTSe1
Outcome
drought‐caused oxidative damagee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The CTS application significantly reduced drought‐caused oxidative damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–979 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in endogenous CTS content by foliar spray of exogenous CTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS enhanced total antioxidant capacity.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
CTSe1
Outcome
total antioxidant capacitye0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“enhancing total antioxidant capacity and activating superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase, and ascorbate peroxidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1103 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in endogenous CTS content by foliar spray of exogenous CTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS activated superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and catalase.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
CTSe1
Outcome
superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalasee0
Direction
activatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“activating superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase, and ascorbate peroxidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1103 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in endogenous CTS content by foliar spray of exogenous CTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS activated ascorbate peroxidase.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
CTSe1
Outcome
ascorbate peroxidasee0
Direction
activatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“activating superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase, and ascorbate peroxidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1103 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in endogenous CTS content by foliar spray of exogenous CTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS promoted water use efficiency during drought.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
CTSe1
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
During drought stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“During drought stress, pretreatment with CTS promoted water use efficiency, carbohydrate (sucrose and glucose) accumulation, energy production, and metabolic homeostasis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1274 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in endogenous CTS content by foliar spray of exogenous CTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS promoted sucrose and glucose accumulation during drought.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
CTSe1
Outcome
carbohydrate (sucrose and glucose) accumulatione0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“pretreatment with CTS promoted water use efficiency, carbohydrate (sucrose and glucose) accumulation, energy production, and metabolic homeostasis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1274 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in endogenous CTS content by foliar spray of exogenous CTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS promoted energy production and metabolic homeostasis during drought.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
CTSe1
Outcome
energy production, and metabolic homeostasise0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“pretreatment with CTS promoted water use efficiency, carbohydrate (sucrose and glucose) accumulation, energy production, and metabolic homeostasis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1274 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in endogenous CTS content by foliar spray of exogenous CTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS did not affect proline accumulation and metabolism.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
Chitosan treatmente0
Outcome
proline accumulation and metabolisme0
Direction
did not have an effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chitosan treatment did not have an effect on proline accumulation and metabolism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1356 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in endogenous CTS content by foliar spray of exogenous CTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS improved leaf GABA accumulation, pyruvic acid and chlorophyll content under drought.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
CTSe1
Outcome
γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) accumulation, pyruvic acid, and chlorophyll contente0
Direction
Improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Improved γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) accumulation, pyruvic acid, and chlorophyll content in leaves were found due to CTS treatment under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1508 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in endogenous CTS content by foliar spray of exogenous CTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–658 · show in text ↑

chitosan · physiology: osmolytes · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chitosan · quality: sugar starch · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · molecular: metabolites · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · physiology: water · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chitosan · physiology: photosynthesis · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chitosan · physiology: oxidative · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chitosan · quality: phytochemicals · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chitosan · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.