Paper · 2020 · Agronomy Journal

Influence of nitrogen rate on winter canola production in the southeastern United States

Yaru Lin; Dexter B. Watts; H. Allen Torbert; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Canola ( Brassica napins L.) has the potential for being used in a double‐cropping system (two crops grown in 1 yr) as a winter crop in the humid subtropical southeastern U.S. climate, but little information is known about its nitrogen (N) management when grown in this region. Thus, a field study was conducted at two locations (Shorter, AL: Compass loamy sand; Prattville, AL: Lucedale fine sandy loam) in 2016 to determine the effect of different rates of N fertilizer on plant growth, seed yield, and N uptake of canola. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications. The N rates included were 0, 68, 135, 180, 202, and 270 kg N ha −1 . Linear‐plateau regression was used to evaluate the response of plant growth, seed yield, and N uptake to N rate. Overall, canola growth, yield, and N uptake were highly dependent on N fertility. Applying 180 kg N ha −1 or more for canola production significantly increased plant height, plant biomass accumulation, seed yield, and N uptake compared with the unfertilized control at both locations. The linear‐plateau regression model indicated that the optimal N rate was 197–232 kg N ha −1 for these southeastern U.S. soils. This study suggests that winter canola grown in a humid subtropical region of the United States can be a successful winter crop for a double‐crop production system and provide seed yields comparable to yields from major winter canola production areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer significantly increased canola plant height and biomass compared with the unfertilized control

Treatment
different rates of N fertilizere2
Outcome
plant height, plant biomass accumulatione3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
unfertilized controle3
Setting
Shorter, ALe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Canola ( Brassica napins L.) has the potential for being used in a double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“a field study was conducted at two locations (Shorter, AL: Compass loamy sand; Prattville, AL: Lucedale fine sandy loam) in 2016 to determine the effect of different rates of N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–480 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly increased plant height, plant biomass accumulation, seed yield, and N uptake compared with the unfertilized control at both locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1079 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer significantly increased canola seed yield and N uptake compared with the unfertilized control

Treatment
different rates of N fertilizere2
Outcome
seed yield, and N uptakee3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
unfertilized controle3
Setting
Shorter, ALe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Canola ( Brassica napins L.) has the potential for being used in a double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“a field study was conducted at two locations (Shorter, AL: Compass loamy sand; Prattville, AL: Lucedale fine sandy loam) in 2016 to determine the effect of different rates of N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–480 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly increased plant height, plant biomass accumulation, seed yield, and N uptake compared with the unfertilized control at both locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1079 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal N rate for winter canola on these southeastern soils was 197–232 kg N ha −1

Outcome
optimal N ratee5
Value
197–232 kg N ha −1e5
Setting
southeastern U.S. soilse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Canola ( Brassica napins L.) has the potential for being used in a double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–82 · show in text ↑
e5

“the optimal N rate was 197–232 kg N ha −1 for these southeastern U.S. soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1207 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Winter canola can be a successful winter crop in a double-crop system in the humid subtropical US

Taxon
winter canolaBrassica napus var. napuse6
Outcome
successful winter crope6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Canola ( Brassica napins L.) has the potential for being used in a double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–82 · show in text ↑
e6

“winter canola grown in a humid subtropical region of the United States can be a successful winter crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1336 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter canola in the humid subtropical US provides seed yields comparable to major winter canola production areas

Taxon
winter canolaBrassica napus var. napuse7
Outcome
seed yieldse7
Direction
comparablee7
Comparator
major winter canola production arease7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“provide seed yields comparable to yields from major winter canola production areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1459 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 89 positive, 17 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

336 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

374 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.