Paper · 2020 · Plants

Leaf Age and Position Effects on Quantum Yield and Photosynthetic Capacity in Hemp Crowns

William L. Bauerle; Cole McCullough; Megan Iversen; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
34
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

We examined the aging of leaves prior to abscission and the consequences for estimating whole-crown primary production in Cannabis sativa L. (hemp). Leaves at three vertical positions in hemp crowns were examined from initial full leaf expansion until 42 days later. Photosynthetic capacity decreased as leaves aged regardless of crown position, light intensity, or photoperiod. Although leaves remained green, the photosynthetic capacity declined logarithmically to values of 50% and 25% of the maximum 9 and 25 days later, respectively. Plants grown under +450 μmol m−2 s−1 supplemental photosynthetically active radiation or enriched diffuse light responded similarly; there was no evidence that photoperiod or enriched diffuse light modified the gas exchange pattern. At approximately 14 days after full leaf expansion, leaf light levels >500 μmol m−2 s−1 decreased photosynthesis, which resulted in ≥10% lower maximum electron transport rate at ≥ 20 days of growth period. Furthermore, leaves were saturated at lower light levels as leaf age progressed (≤500 μmol m−2 s−1). Incorporating leaf age corrections of photosynthetic physiology is needed when estimating hemp primary production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic capacity of hemp leaves decreased as leaves aged, regardless of crown position, light intensity or photoperiod

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativae1
Organ / stage
leavese2
Outcome
Photosynthetic capacitye2
Direction
decreasede2
Qualifier
regardless of crown position, light intensity, or photoperiode2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cannabis sativa L. (hemp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–147 · show in text ↑
e2

“Photosynthetic capacity decreased as leaves aged regardless of crown position, light intensity, or photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–377 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic capacity declined logarithmically to 50% of the maximum about 9 days after full leaf expansion

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativae1
Outcome
photosynthetic capacitye2
Direction
declinede2
Value
50%e2
Qualifier
of the maximum 9 and 25 days later, respectivelye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cannabis sativa L. (hemp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–147 · show in text ↑
e2

“the photosynthetic capacity declined logarithmically to values of 50% and 25% of the maximum 9 and 25 days later, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–537 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic capacity declined logarithmically to 25% of the maximum 25 days later

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativae1
Outcome
photosynthetic capacitye2
Direction
declinede2
Value
25%e2
Qualifier
25 days latere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cannabis sativa L. (hemp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–147 · show in text ↑
e2

“the photosynthetic capacity declined logarithmically to values of 50% and 25% of the maximum 9 and 25 days later, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photoperiod and enriched diffuse light did not modify the gas exchange pattern of hemp

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativae1
Treatment
photoperiod or enriched diffuse lighte2
Outcome
gas exchange patterne2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cannabis sativa L. (hemp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–147 · show in text ↑
e2

“there was no evidence that photoperiod or enriched diffuse light modified the gas exchange pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf light levels above 500 μmol m−2 s−1 decreased photosynthesis about 14 days after full leaf expansion

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativae1
Treatment
leaf light levels >500 μmol m−2 s−1e2
Outcome
photosynthesise2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cannabis sativa L. (hemp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–147 · show in text ↑
e2

“At approximately 14 days after full leaf expansion, leaf light levels >500 μmol m−2 s−1 decreased photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf light levels above 500 μmol m−2 s−1 gave a 10% or greater lower maximum electron transport rate after 20 days of growth

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativae1
Treatment
leaf light levels >500 μmol m−2 s−1e2
Outcome
maximum electron transport ratee3
Direction
lowere3
Value
≥10%e3
Qualifier
at ≥ 20 days of growth periode3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cannabis sativa L. (hemp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–147 · show in text ↑
e2

“At approximately 14 days after full leaf expansion, leaf light levels >500 μmol m−2 s−1 decreased photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–884 · show in text ↑
e3

“which resulted in ≥10% lower maximum electron transport rate at ≥ 20 days of growth period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–976 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves saturated at lower light levels as leaf age progressed

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativae1
Organ / stage
leavese2
Outcome
leaves were saturatede2
Direction
lowere2
Value
≤500 μmol m−2 s−1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cannabis sativa L. (hemp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–147 · show in text ↑
e2

“leaves were saturated at lower light levels as leaf age progressed (≤500 μmol m−2 s−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1077 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: gas exchange · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.