Paper · 2019 · Journal of Biological Control

Efficacy of integrated pest management tools evaluated against Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) on tomato in India

V Sridhar; S Onkara naik; K.S Nitin; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

South American tomato moth, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) is an invasive pest on tomato and other solanaceous crops. In general, 20 to 30 % yield loss is caused by this pest and sometimes it may result in 100% damage, if timely management interventions are not followed. Though the pest was reported in India during 2014, presently it has spread to several tomato growing states. In the present study various IPM tools have been evaluated against this pest. As a long-term strategy of resistance breeding, genotype screening was carried out for identification of resistance sources from wild and cultivated tomato genotypes showing resistance/tolerance against T. absoluta . Among the evaluated wild and cultivated tomato genotypes, Solanum pennellii (Accession, LA 1940) was identified as a resistant source against T. absoluta both under choice and no-choice bioassays and is being used for resistance breeding. Various entomopathogens ( Bacillus thuringiensis , Metarhizium anisopliae , Beauveria bassiana and M. rileyi ), egg parasitoids ( Trichogramma chilonis , T. pretiosum and Trichogrammatoidea bactrae ), light traps, pheromone traps, synthetic insecticides, botanical origin insecticides were also evaluated for their relative efficacy. Among the egg parasitoids T. pretiosum and among synthetic chemicals, spinetoram 12 SC@ 1.25ml/l were found very effective for the management of T. absoluta . Yellow light traps were found as an effective component for integrated management of T. absoluta . Azadirachtin 5% EC at the tested concentrations showed highest mean radial growth (24.67 mm) with relatively less inhibition (16.51%) of M. anisopliae indicating these combinations can be effectively utilised in the eco-friendly management of T. absoluta . We reported natural incidence of M. anisopliae on T. absoluta larvae, causing up to 35 per cent mortality during 2016-17.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solanum pennellii accession LA 1940 resisted T. absoluta in choice and no-choice assays.

Taxon
Solanum pennelliiSolanum pennelliie0
Material
LA 1940e0
Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
resistant source against T. absolutae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum pennellii
Solanum pennellii · Taxon(c) Matt Berger, some rights reserved (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solanum pennellii (Accession, LA 1940) was identified as a resistant source against T. absoluta both under choice and no-choice bioassays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. pretiosum was very effective for T. absoluta management.

Treatment
T. pretiosume0
Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Second interactor
T. pretiosumTrichogramma pretiosume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
management of T. absolutae0
Direction
very effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the egg parasitoids T. pretiosum and among synthetic chemicals, spinetoram 12 SC@ 1.25ml/l were found very effective for the management of T. absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinetoram was very effective for T. absoluta management.

Treatment
spinetoram 12 SC@ 1.25ml/le0
Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
management of T. absolutae0
Direction
very effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the egg parasitoids T. pretiosum and among synthetic chemicals, spinetoram 12 SC@ 1.25ml/l were found very effective for the management of T. absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow light traps were effective for T. absoluta management.

Treatment
Yellow light trapse0
Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
integrated management of T. absolutae0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yellow light traps were found as an effective component for integrated management of T. absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1524 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin treatment gave M. anisopliae 24.67 mm radial growth.

Treatment
Azadirachtin 5% ECe0
Interactor
M. anisopliaeMetarhizium anisopliaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mean radial growthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
24.67 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Metarhizium anisopliae
Metarhizium anisopliae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryChengshu Wang and Yuxian Xia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azadirachtin 5% EC at the tested concentrations showed highest mean radial growth (24.67 mm) with relatively less inhibition (16.51%) of M. anisopliae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1677 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin treatment gave 16.51% inhibition of M. anisopliae.

Treatment
Azadirachtin 5% ECe0
Interactor
M. anisopliaeMetarhizium anisopliaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibition (16.51%) of M. anisopliaee0
Direction
relatively lesse0
Value
16.51%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Metarhizium anisopliae
Metarhizium anisopliae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryChengshu Wang and Yuxian Xia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azadirachtin 5% EC at the tested concentrations showed highest mean radial growth (24.67 mm) with relatively less inhibition (16.51%) of M. anisopliae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1677 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural M. anisopliae incidence caused up to 35 per cent mortality of T. absoluta larvae.

Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Second interactor
M. anisopliaeMetarhizium anisopliaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
T. absoluta larvae, causing up to 35 per cent mortalitye0
Value
35 per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Metarhizium anisopliae
Metarhizium anisopliae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryChengshu Wang and Yuxian Xia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“natural incidence of M. anisopliae on T. absoluta larvae, causing up to 35 per cent mortality during 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1796–1904 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 · show in text ↑

Trichogramma pretiosum · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Spinetoram · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

light · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

trap barrier · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.