Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2017 at Agricultural College Farm, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur, Karnataka to study the influence of foliar organic nutrition on growth and yield of groundnut. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with 3 replications. The experiment treatments comprised of 9 organic extracts viz. Vermi compost extract (1:10), FYM extract (1:10), Neem cake extract (1:10), Cow dung extract (1:10), Pongamia cake extract (1:10), Panchagavya at 3%, Jeevamrutha at 3%, Panchamrutha at 3%, Humic acid at 0.004%, Water spray and one inorganic treatment Pulse magic at 2%, and a absolute control. The results indicated significant improvement in plant height, number of branches, total dry matter accumulation, leaf area, oil content, protein contentt, number of pods per plant, test weight, shelling per cent and yield per hectare with foliar application of panchagavya at 3 per cent as compared other organic treatments and control. However, pulse magic at 2 per cent spray showed statistically higher values as compared to panchagavya at 3 per cent.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Panchagavya at 3 per cent significantly increased plant height, branch number and dry matter versus organic treatments and control.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- foliar application of panchagavya at 3 per cente0
- Outcome
- plant height, number of branches, total dry matter accumulatione0
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Comparator
- other organic treatments and controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results indicated significant improvement in plant height, number of branches, total dry matter accumulation, leaf area, oil content, protein contentt, number of pods per plant, test weight, shelling per cent and yield per hectare with foliar application of panchagavya at 3 per cent as compared other organic treatments and control.”
t0“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Panchagavya at 3 per cent significantly improved leaf area, oil content and protein content versus other treatments and control.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- foliar application of panchagavya at 3 per cente0
- Outcome
- leaf area, oil content, protein contentte0
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Comparator
- other organic treatments and controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results indicated significant improvement in plant height, number of branches, total dry matter accumulation, leaf area, oil content, protein contentt, number of pods per plant, test weight, shelling per cent and yield per hectare with foliar application of panchagavya at 3 per cent as compared other organic treatments and control.”
t0“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Panchagavya at 3 per cent significantly improved pod number, test weight and shelling percentage versus other treatments and control.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- foliar application of panchagavya at 3 per cente0
- Outcome
- number of pods per plant, test weight, shelling per cente0
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Comparator
- other organic treatments and controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results indicated significant improvement in plant height, number of branches, total dry matter accumulation, leaf area, oil content, protein contentt, number of pods per plant, test weight, shelling per cent and yield per hectare with foliar application of panchagavya at 3 per cent as compared other organic treatments and control.”
t0“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Panchagavya at 3 per cent significantly improved yield per hectare versus other treatments and control.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- foliar application of panchagavya at 3 per cente0
- Outcome
- yield per hectaree0
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Comparator
- other organic treatments and controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results indicated significant improvement in plant height, number of branches, total dry matter accumulation, leaf area, oil content, protein contentt, number of pods per plant, test weight, shelling per cent and yield per hectare with foliar application of panchagavya at 3 per cent as compared other organic treatments and control.”
t0“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Pulse magic at 2 per cent gave statistically higher values than panchagavya at 3 per cent.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- pulse magic at 2 per cent spraye0
- Outcome
- valuese0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- panchagavya at 3 per cente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“However, pulse magic at 2 per cent spray showed statistically higher values as compared to panchagavya at 3 per cent.”
t0“groundnut”
The same questions in other papers
application · quality: grain · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →application · quality: oil · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →application · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
214 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
218 papers more in this group
See all 222 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.