Paper · 2020 · Agronomy

Straw Incorporation Management Affects Maize Grain Yield through Regulating Nitrogen Uptake, Water Use Efficiency, and Root Distribution

Pengxiang Sui; Ping Tian; Hongli Lian; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
50
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Returning crop straw to soil can potentially improve soil health and crop production, facilitating sustainable agriculture. However, the effects of straw incorporation with various tillage management techniques combined with nitrogen (N) regimes on crop root growth, and water and N utility are not well understood. In this study, rotary tillage (RTS) and plow tillage (PTS) for straw incorporation combined with N regimes (CK, no N applied; LN, 112 kg N ha−1; MN, 187 kg N ha−1; and HN, 262 kg N ha−1) were used to determine their effects on soil water and mineral N availability, root distribution, crop N uptake, grain yield, and water use efficiency (WUE) of maize in northeast China. The results demonstrate that higher levels of pre-sowing soil-water storage and field evapotranspiration (ET), and lower levels of WUE and pre-sowing soil mineral N storage (Nmin-PS) at a depth of 0–60 cm were obtained with the RTS treatments as compared to the PTS treatments. N addition improved Nmin-PS and post-harvest soil mineral N storage (Nmin-PH) at a depth of 60–100 cm in 2016, and increased WUE compared to CK. RTS treatments enhanced root weight density (RWD) at a depth of 0–60 cm in 2016–2017, root length density (RLD), ratio of root length density (RLDR), and ratio of root weight density (RWDR) at a depth of 30–60 cm in 2016, and RLD at a depth of 0–30 cm in 2017. N addition promoted RLD and RWD at a depth of 0–10 cm in 2016–2017. RTS treatments reduced pre-silking shoot N uptake (NPS) and grain yield. Shoot N uptake and grain yield were enhanced in response to increasing levels of N; however, the grain yield did not show further significant improvements when the amount of N applied was over 187 kg N ha−1 (except for RTS in 2016). Overall, tillage with straw incorporation management and N levels markedly affected the soil physicochemical properties (such as ET, Nmin-PS, and Nmin-PH). This influenced grain yield indirectly by further mediating root traits (RLD, RWD, RLDR, and RWDR) with consequences for the NPS and post-silking shoot N uptake (NPOS) of maize, which were found to have greatest direct and positive impact on maize grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In maize in northeast China, rotary tillage with straw incorporation (RTS) gave higher pre-sowing soil-water storage and higher field evapotranspiration at 0–60 cm depth than plow tillage with straw incorporation (PTS).

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
RTS treatmentse0
Outcome
pre-sowing soil-water storage and field evapotranspiration (ET)e0
Direction
higher levelse0
Qualifier
at a depth of 0–60 cme0
Comparator
PTS treatmentse0
Setting
northeast Chinae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher levels of pre-sowing soil-water storage and field evapotranspiration (ET), and lower levels of WUE and pre-sowing soil mineral N storage (Nmin-PS) at a depth of 0–60 cm were obtained with the RTS treatments as compared to the PTS treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–965 · show in text ↑
e1

“water use efficiency (WUE) of maize in northeast China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In maize in northeast China, RTS gave lower water use efficiency and lower pre-sowing soil mineral N storage at 0–60 cm depth than PTS.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
RTS treatmentse0
Outcome
WUE and pre-sowing soil mineral N storage (Nmin-PS)e0
Direction
lower levelse0
Qualifier
at a depth of 0–60 cme0
Comparator
PTS treatmentse0
Setting
northeast Chinae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher levels of pre-sowing soil-water storage and field evapotranspiration (ET), and lower levels of WUE and pre-sowing soil mineral N storage (Nmin-PS) at a depth of 0–60 cm were obtained with the RTS treatments as compared to the PTS treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–965 · show in text ↑
e1

“water use efficiency (WUE) of maize in northeast China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N addition improved pre-sowing and post-harvest soil mineral N storage at 60–100 cm depth in 2016.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
N additione0
Outcome
Nmin-PS and post-harvest soil mineral N storage (Nmin-PH)e0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
at a depth of 60–100 cm in 2016e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N addition improved Nmin-PS and post-harvest soil mineral N storage (Nmin-PH) at a depth of 60–100 cm in 2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1076 · show in text ↑
e1

“water use efficiency (WUE) of maize in northeast China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N addition increased water use efficiency of maize compared with the no-N control (CK).

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
N additione0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N addition improved Nmin-PS and post-harvest soil mineral N storage (Nmin-PH) at a depth of 60–100 cm in 2016, and increased WUE compared to CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1110 · show in text ↑
e1

“water use efficiency (WUE) of maize in northeast China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RTS treatments enhanced root weight density at 0–60 cm depth in 2016–2017 in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
RTS treatmentse0
Outcome
root weight density (RWD)e0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
at a depth of 0–60 cm in 2016–2017e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RTS treatments enhanced root weight density (RWD) at a depth of 0–60 cm in 2016–2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1196 · show in text ↑
e1

“water use efficiency (WUE) of maize in northeast China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RTS treatments enhanced root length density and the ratios of root length density and root weight density at 30–60 cm depth in 2016.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
RTS treatmentse0
Outcome
root length density (RLD), ratio of root length density (RLDR), and ratio of root weight density (RWDR)e1
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
at a depth of 30–60 cm in 2016e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RTS treatments enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1135 · show in text ↑
e1

“root length density (RLD), ratio of root length density (RLDR), and ratio of root weight density (RWDR) at a depth of 30–60 cm in 2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1332 · show in text ↑
e2

“water use efficiency (WUE) of maize in northeast China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RTS treatments enhanced root length density at 0–30 cm depth in 2017.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
RTS treatmentse0
Outcome
RLDe1
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
at a depth of 0–30 cm in 2017e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RTS treatments enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1135 · show in text ↑
e1

“RLD at a depth of 0–30 cm in 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1371 · show in text ↑
e2

“water use efficiency (WUE) of maize in northeast China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N addition promoted root length density and root weight density at 0–10 cm depth in 2016–2017.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
N additione0
Outcome
RLD and RWDe0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
at a depth of 0–10 cm in 2016–2017e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N addition promoted RLD and RWD at a depth of 0–10 cm in 2016–2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1439 · show in text ↑
e1

“water use efficiency (WUE) of maize in northeast China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RTS treatments reduced pre-silking shoot N uptake and grain yield of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
RTS treatmentse0
Outcome
pre-silking shoot N uptake (NPS) and grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RTS treatments reduced pre-silking shoot N uptake (NPS) and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1512 · show in text ↑
e1

“water use efficiency (WUE) of maize in northeast China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot N uptake and grain yield of maize were enhanced with increasing levels of N.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
increasing levels of Ne0
Outcome
Shoot N uptake and grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot N uptake and grain yield were enhanced in response to increasing levels of N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1596 · show in text ↑
e1

“water use efficiency (WUE) of maize in northeast China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield showed no further significant improvement when N applied exceeded 187 kg N ha−1, except for RTS in 2016.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
amount of N applied was over 187 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not show further significant improvementse0
Qualifier
except for RTS in 2016e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield did not show further significant improvements when the amount of N applied was over 187 kg N ha−1 (except for RTS in 2016)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1745 · show in text ↑
e1

“water use efficiency (WUE) of maize in northeast China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–687 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage with straw incorporation and N levels influenced maize grain yield indirectly by mediating root traits (RLD, RWD, RLDR, RWDR).

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
indirectly by further mediating root traits (RLD, RWD, RLDR, and RWDR)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This influenced grain yield indirectly by further mediating root traits (RLD, RWD, RLDR, and RWDR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1903–2001 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Grain Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–56 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-silking and post-silking shoot N uptake of maize had the greatest direct and positive impact on grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
maize grain yielde0
Qualifier
greatest direct and positive impacte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the NPS and post-silking shoot N uptake (NPOS) of maize, which were found to have greatest direct and positive impact on maize grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2024–2162 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 52 positive, 9 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

748 papers: 619 positive, 129 negative or no effect

618 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Nitrogen deficiency reduced maize growth by 38%.

    Changes in root length at the reproductive stage of maize plants grown in the field and quartz sand · 2010

    Same directionCited by this paperAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. negative
  3. no effect

744 papers more in this group

See all 748 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,906 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.