Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources

The Productivity of Maize and Sorghum Cultivated in Organic System

Jolanta Bojarszczuk

11
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of the study was the assessment of productivity of maize and sorghum in depend on cultivation method and fertilizer dose cropped in ecological system. The study was conducted at the Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation -Agricultural Experimental Station Grabw [Poland]. The first order factor was cultivation method and the second factor were composted manure dose. The study showed that the use of mechanical weed control in the cultivation of maize and sorghum resulted in a significant increase in the fresh matter yield compared to the control treatment. Increasing composted manure dose positively affected the yield of both plant species. The yield of fresh matter of maize fertilized with a dose of 20t ha-1 in the treatment without weed control, was by about 15% lower than yield of maize fertilized with a twice higher manure dose. Maize plants that were not cultivated by mechanical methods contained less dry matter, regardless of the composted manure dose, compared to mechanically treated plants. The dry matter content in cobs was much higher than in whole maize plants. Much less dry matter content in the cobs of maize not mechanically cultivated than in the cobs of mechanically cultivated plants. The share of seeds in the maize cob in the control treatment, was about 15% lower than in the mechanically-treated plants. An increase in organic fertilization dose, had no effect on the share of cob in maize plant structure, while the cultivation method had significant influence of this feature.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical weed control significantly increased the fresh matter yield of organically grown maize compared with the control treatment.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mechanical weed controle0
Outcome
fresh matter yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
e0

“the use of mechanical weed control in the cultivation of maize and sorghum resulted in a significant increase in the fresh matter yield compared to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical weed control significantly increased the fresh matter yield of organically grown sorghum compared with the control treatment.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
mechanical weed controle0
Outcome
fresh matter yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“the use of mechanical weed control in the cultivation of maize and sorghum resulted in a significant increase in the fresh matter yield compared to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the composted manure dose positively affected the yield of maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Increasing composted manure dosee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increasing composted manure dose positively affected the yield of both plant species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the composted manure dose positively affected the yield of sorghum.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Increasing composted manure dosee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increasing composted manure dose positively affected the yield of both plant species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without weed control, the fresh matter yield of maize given 20 t/ha manure was about 15% lower than that of maize given twice that manure dose.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
dose of 20t ha-1e0
Outcome
yield of fresh mattere0
Direction
lowere0
Value
15%e0
Comparator
twice higher manure dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of fresh matter of maize fertilized with a dose of 20t ha-1 in the treatment without weed control, was by about 15% lower than yield of maize fertilized with a twice higher manure dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–858 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize plants not cultivated mechanically contained less dry matter than mechanically treated plants at every manure dose.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
not cultivated by mechanical methodse0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
regardless of the composted manure dosee0
Comparator
mechanically treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize plants that were not cultivated by mechanical methods contained less dry matter, regardless of the composted manure dose, compared to mechanically treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–1027 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dry matter content in maize cobs was much higher than in whole maize plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
dry matter content in cobse0
Direction
much highere0
Comparator
whole maize plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry matter content in cobs was much higher than in whole maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cobs of maize not mechanically cultivated had much less dry matter than the cobs of mechanically cultivated plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
not mechanically cultivatede0
Outcome
dry matter content in the cobse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
mechanically cultivated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Much less dry matter content in the cobs of maize not mechanically cultivated than in the cobs of mechanically cultivated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The share of seeds in the maize cob in the control treatment was about 15% lower than in mechanically treated plants.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
share of seeds in the maize cobe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
15%e0
Comparator
mechanically-treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The share of seeds in the maize cob in the control treatment, was about 15% lower than in the mechanically-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An increase in organic fertilization dose had no effect on the share of cob in the maize plant structure.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
organic fertilization dosee0
Outcome
share of cob in maize plant structuree0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in organic fertilization dose, had no effect on the share of cob in maize plant structure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivation method had a significant influence on the share of cob in the maize plant structure.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
cultivation methode0
Outcome
share of cob in maize plant structuree0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25 · show in text ↑
e0

“share of cob in maize plant structure, while the cultivation method had significant influence of this feature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1530 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · SorghumResults differ

66 papers: 52 positive, 14 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

fertilization · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 83 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

446 papers: 418 positive, 28 negative or no effect

417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

442 papers more in this group

See all 446 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.