Paper · 2020 · Agronomy

The Use of a Plant-Based Biostimulant Improves Plant Performances and Fruit Quality in Tomato Plants Grown at Elevated Temperatures

Silvana Francesca; Carmen Arena; Bruno Hay Mele; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
127
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abiotic stresses can cause a substantial decline in fruit quality due to negative impacts on plant growth, physiology and reproduction. The objective of this study was to verify if the use of a biostimulant based on plant and yeast extracts, rich in amino acids and that contains microelements (boron, zinc and manganese) can ensure good crop yield and quality in tomato plants grown at elevated temperatures (up to 42 °C). We investigated physiological responses of four different tomato landraces that were cultivated under plastic tunnel and treated with the biostimulant CycoFlow. The application of the biostimulant stimulated growth (plants up to 48.5% taller) and number of fruits (up to 105.3%). In plants treated with the biostimulant, antioxidants contents were higher compared to non-treated plants, both in leaves and in fruits. In particular, the content of ascorbic acid increased after treatments with CycoFlow. For almost all the traits studied, the effect of the biostimulant depended on the genotype it was applied on. Altogether, the use of the biostimulant on tomato plants led to better plant performances at elevated temperatures, that could be attributed also to a stronger antioxidant defence system, and to a better fruit nutritional quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CycoFlow increased tomato plant height by up to 48.5%.

Taxon
Tomato PlantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
biostimulante0
Outcome
plantse0
Direction
tallere0
Value
48.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the biostimulant stimulated growth (plants up to 48.5% taller)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–666 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CycoFlow increased tomato fruit number by up to 105.3%.

Taxon
Tomato PlantsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
biostimulante0
Outcome
number of fruitse0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
105.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the biostimulant stimulated growth (plants up to 48.5% taller) and number of fruits (up to 105.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated tomato leaves had higher antioxidant content than untreated leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
biostimulante0
Outcome
antioxidants contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In plants treated with the biostimulant, antioxidants contents were higher compared to non-treated plants, both in leaves and in fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated tomato fruits had higher antioxidant content than untreated fruits.

Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
biostimulante0
Outcome
antioxidants contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In plants treated with the biostimulant, antioxidants contents were higher compared to non-treated plants, both in leaves and in fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CycoFlow increased ascorbic acid content.

Treatment
CycoFlowe0
Outcome
content of ascorbic acide0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the content of ascorbic acid increased after treatments with CycoFlow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For almost all traits, the biostimulant effect depended on tomato genotype.

Material
genotypee0
Outcome
effect of the biostimulante0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For almost all the traits studied, the effect of the biostimulant depended on the genotype it was applied on”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed improved tomato performance partly to stronger antioxidant defence.

Outcome
better plant performancese0
Qualifier
stronger antioxidant defence systeme0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“better plant performances at elevated temperatures, that could be attributed also to a stronger antioxidant defence system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded the biostimulant improved fruit nutritional quality under elevated temperatures.

Taxon
tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
biostimulante0
Outcome
fruit nutritional qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
elevated temperaturese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of the biostimulant on tomato plants led to better plant performances at elevated temperatures, that could be attributed also to a stronger antioxidant defence system, and to a better fruit nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1266 · show in text ↑

other · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

other · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

other · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

130 papers: 117 positive, 13 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

126 papers more in this group

See all 130 papers →

other · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

175 papers: 157 positive, 18 negative or no effect

156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

171 papers more in this group

See all 175 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.