Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Influence of nutrient management and establishment methods on yield and economics of rice in calcareous soils of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Pal; Pankaj Singh; AK Pant; et al.

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out at Research Farm, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University Pusa, Bihar during kharif 2018 on calcareous sandy loam soil. The experiment was laid-out in a split-plot design (SPD). The main-plot treatments included three crop establishment methods, viz. puddled transplanted rice (M1-TPR), wet direct-seeded rice (M2-DSR-wet) and dry direct-seeded rice (M3-DSR-dry). In sub-plots, five different nutrient management methods were T1 (100% STCR Based Dose of Fertilizer + ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1), T2 (75% DF + 25% STCR based Recommended Dose of Nitrogen through Vermicompost), T3 (100% STCR based Recommended Dose of Nitrogen through Vermicompost), T4 (100% DF + 50% STCR based Recommended Dose of Nitrogen through Vermicompost) and T5 (50% DF + 25% STCR based Recommended Dose of Nitrogen through Vermicompost) were replicated thrice under each method. The results found that the plant height, yield attributing characters(number of tillers per meter square, number of panicles per meter square, filled grains per panicles and test weight) and yield recorded significantly higher values under transplanted rice with T4 (100% DF + 50% STCR based Recommended Dose of Nitrogen through Vermicompost) recording significantly higher values among different nutrient management systems. The economics of all the cultivation practices recorded higher B:C ratio (0.73) and net returns (₹ 34684 ha-1) under DSR-wet with T1 (100% STCR Based Dose of Fertilizer + ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1) giving farmers an alternative method for rice production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted rice with T4 gave significantly higher plant height, yield components and yield.

Treatment
transplanted rice with T4 (100% DF + 50% STCR based Recommended Dose of Nitrogen through Vermicompost)e0
Outcome
plant height, yield attributing characters(number of tillers per meter square, number of panicles per meter square, filled grains per panicles and test weight) and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
different nutrient management systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results found that the plant height, yield attributing characters(number of tillers per meter square, number of panicles per meter square, filled grains per panicles and test weight) and yield recorded significantly higher values under transplanted rice with T4 (100% DF + 50% STCR based Recommended Dose of Nitrogen through Vermicompost) recording significantly higher values among different nutrient management systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSR-wet with T1 had the highest benefit-cost ratio of 0.73.

Treatment
DSR-wet with T1 (100% STCR Based Dose of Fertilizer + ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.73e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher B:C ratio (0.73) and net returns (₹ 34684 ha-1) under DSR-wet with T1 (100% STCR Based Dose of Fertilizer + ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSR-wet with T1 had higher net returns of ₹ 34684 ha-1.

Treatment
DSR-wet with T1 (100% STCR Based Dose of Fertilizer + ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
₹ 34684 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher B:C ratio (0.73) and net returns (₹ 34684 ha-1) under DSR-wet with T1 (100% STCR Based Dose of Fertilizer + ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–89 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

145 papers: 144 positive, 1 negative or no effect

143 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

102 papers: 81 positive, 21 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

transplanting · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

148 papers: 129 positive, 19 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.