Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Direct seeding worsened processing, cooking, eating and nutritional quality versus transplanting.

A claim from Effect of Planting Methods on Quality of Different Growth and Development Types of Japonica Rice Under High-Yielding Cultivation Condition · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct seeding worsened processing, cooking, eating and nutritional quality versus transplanting.

Treatment
DSe0
Outcome
processing quality,cooking and eating quality and nutritional qualitye0
Direction
worsee0
Comparator
AT and MTe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa Japonica Group
Oryza sativa Japonica Group · TaxonAugustus Binu : flickr : Instagram · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with AT and MT,the appearance quality of DS is slightly better,while processing quality,cooking and eating quality and nutritional quality become worse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1926
t0

“Japonica Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–96

Title

Effect of Planting Methods on Quality of Different Growth and Development Types of Japonica Rice Under High-Yielding Cultivation Condition

Hongcheng Zhang Zhongguo nongye Kexue 2012

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-af188ea03973efae18f902b0216c6e4e3d26ea093c40c4a9998681a639fe7133 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 15 in the model’s answer

transplanting · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.