Paper · 2022 · Agriculture

Response of Rice Yield and Grain Quality to Combined Nitrogen Application Rate and Planting Density in Saline Area

Yinglong Chen; Yang Liu; Shiqi Dong; et al.

13
claims
41
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To determine the combining effects of nitrogen application rate and planting density on rice yield and grain quality formation under salinity conditions, a field experiment was conducted in the coastal saline area using Oryza sativa L. cv. Nangeng 9108 from 2019 to 2020. The experiment was designed with six nitrogen rates (0, 210, 255, 300, 345, and 390 kg ha−1; denoted as N0-N390, respectively) and two transplanting densities (334,000 and 278,000 hills ha−1; denoted as D1 and D2, respectively). The results indicated that, with the increase of nitrogen input rate, the panicles number and spikelets per panicle increased first, subsequently decreased, and peaked under 300 kg ha−1 N, whereas the filled-kernel rate and grain weight displayed a decreasing trend. The panicle number and grain weight were higher under D1 treatment compared to those under D2 treatment, while the spikelet number per panicle and the filled-kernel rate displayed an opposite trend. The grain yield displayed highest under N300D1 treatment among all treatments, accompanied by the highest agronomic N use efficiency, and the actual yield reached 8060.4 kg ha−1 and 7869.8 kg ha−1 in 2019 and 2020, respectively. Increased nitrogen application rate significantly improved the grain processing quality and nutritional quality, while reducing the appearance quality and cooking/eating quality. Higher transplant density was conductive to grain nutritional quality, but notably reduced the processing quality, appearance quality and cooking/eating quality. Overall, a combination of 300 kg ha−1 nitrogen rate and 334,000 hills ha−1 planting density was recommended for relatively higher rice yield and better grain quality in the saline area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With increasing nitrogen input rate, panicle number and spikelets per panicle first increased then decreased, peaking at 300 kg ha-1 N.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae0
Material
Nangeng 9108e0
Treatment
nitrogen input ratee2
Outcome
panicles number and spikelets per paniclee2
Direction
increased first, subsequently decreasede2
Qualifier
peaked under 300 kg ha−1 Ne2
Setting
coastal saline areae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oryza sativa L. cv. Nangeng 9108”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–252 · show in text ↑
e1

“coastal saline area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“with the increase of nitrogen input rate, the panicles number and spikelets per panicle increased first, subsequently decreased, and peaked under 300 kg ha−1 N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With increasing nitrogen input rate, filled-kernel rate and grain weight showed a decreasing trend.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae0
Material
Nangeng 9108e0
Treatment
nitrogen input ratee2
Outcome
filled-kernel rate and grain weighte3
Direction
decreasing trende3
Setting
coastal saline areae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oryza sativa L. cv. Nangeng 9108”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–252 · show in text ↑
e1

“coastal saline area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“with the increase of nitrogen input rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–569 · show in text ↑
e3

“the filled-kernel rate and grain weight displayed a decreasing trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panicle number and grain weight were higher under planting density D1 than under D2.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae0
Material
Nangeng 9108e0
Treatment
D1 treatmente2
Outcome
panicle number and grain weighte2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
D2 treatmente2
Setting
coastal saline areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oryza sativa L. cv. Nangeng 9108”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–252 · show in text ↑
e1

“coastal saline area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“The panicle number and grain weight were higher under D1 treatment compared to those under D2 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spikelet number per panicle and filled-kernel rate showed the opposite trend, being higher under D2 than D1.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae0
Material
Nangeng 9108e0
Treatment
D1 treatmente3
Outcome
spikelet number per panicle and the filled-kernel ratee2
Direction
opposite trende2
Comparator
D2 treatmente3
Setting
coastal saline areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oryza sativa L. cv. Nangeng 9108”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–252 · show in text ↑
e1

“coastal saline area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“the spikelet number per panicle and the filled-kernel rate displayed an opposite trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–965 · show in text ↑
e3

“higher under D1 treatment compared to those under D2 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was highest under the N300D1 treatment among all treatments.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae0
Material
Nangeng 9108e0
Treatment
N300D1 treatmente2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Comparator
all treatmentse2
Setting
coastal saline areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oryza sativa L. cv. Nangeng 9108”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–252 · show in text ↑
e1

“coastal saline area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“The grain yield displayed highest under N300D1 treatment among all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic N use efficiency was highest under the N300D1 treatment.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae0
Material
Nangeng 9108e0
Treatment
N300D1 treatmente2
Outcome
agronomic N use efficiencye2
Direction
higheste2
Comparator
all treatmentse2
Setting
coastal saline areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oryza sativa L. cv. Nangeng 9108”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–252 · show in text ↑
e1

“coastal saline area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“The grain yield displayed highest under N300D1 treatment among all treatments, accompanied by the highest agronomic N use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1099 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actual yield reached 8060.4 kg ha-1 in 2019.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae0
Material
Nangeng 9108e0
Outcome
actual yielde2
Value
8060.4 kg ha−1e2
Qualifier
2019e2
Setting
coastal saline areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oryza sativa L. cv. Nangeng 9108”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–252 · show in text ↑
e1

“coastal saline area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“the actual yield reached 8060.4 kg ha−1 and 7869.8 kg ha−1 in 2019 and 2020, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1194 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actual yield reached 7869.8 kg ha-1 in 2020.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae0
Material
Nangeng 9108e0
Outcome
actual yielde2
Value
7869.8 kg ha−1e2
Qualifier
2020e2
Setting
coastal saline areae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oryza sativa L. cv. Nangeng 9108”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–252 · show in text ↑
e1

“coastal saline area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“the actual yield reached 8060.4 kg ha−1 and 7869.8 kg ha−1 in 2019 and 2020, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased nitrogen application rate significantly improved grain processing quality and nutritional quality.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae0
Material
Nangeng 9108e0
Treatment
nitrogen application ratee2
Outcome
grain processing quality and nutritional qualitye2
Direction
improvede2
Setting
coastal saline areae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oryza sativa L. cv. Nangeng 9108”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–252 · show in text ↑
e1

“coastal saline area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“Increased nitrogen application rate significantly improved the grain processing quality and nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased nitrogen application rate reduced appearance quality and cooking/eating quality.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae0
Material
Nangeng 9108e0
Treatment
nitrogen application ratee2
Outcome
appearance quality and cooking/eating qualitye3
Direction
reducinge3
Setting
coastal saline areae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oryza sativa L. cv. Nangeng 9108”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–252 · show in text ↑
e1

“coastal saline area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“Increased nitrogen application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1231 · show in text ↑
e3

“while reducing the appearance quality and cooking/eating quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher transplant density was conducive to grain nutritional quality.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae0
Material
Nangeng 9108e0
Treatment
Higher transplant densitye2
Outcome
grain nutritional qualitye2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Setting
coastal saline areae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oryza sativa L. cv. Nangeng 9108”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–252 · show in text ↑
e1

“coastal saline area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“Higher transplant density was conductive to grain nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher transplant density notably reduced processing quality, appearance quality and cooking/eating quality.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae0
Material
Nangeng 9108e0
Treatment
Higher transplant densitye2
Outcome
processing quality, appearance quality and cooking/eating qualitye3
Direction
reducede3
Setting
coastal saline areae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oryza sativa L. cv. Nangeng 9108”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–252 · show in text ↑
e1

“coastal saline area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“Higher transplant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1400 · show in text ↑
e3

“notably reduced the processing quality, appearance quality and cooking/eating quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1535 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 300 kg ha-1 nitrogen with 334,000 hills ha-1 planting density for relatively higher rice yield and better grain quality in the saline area.

Treatment
combination of 300 kg ha−1 nitrogen rate and 334,000 hills ha−1 planting densitye0
Outcome
relatively higher rice yield and better grain qualitye0
Setting
saline areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a combination of 300 kg ha−1 nitrogen rate and 334,000 hills ha−1 planting density was recommended for relatively higher rice yield and better grain quality in the saline area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1721 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

102 papers: 81 positive, 21 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

transplanting · quality: general · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

transplanting · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

nitrogen · quality: general · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 46 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,803 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.