Abstract
Cost-effectiveness calculations for computational irrigation options, costs of sugar beet productivity by macro and microelements, costs associated with the assembly of single added micro surgeons, cost of microwave system, expenditure on production of products according to options, etc. the experimental results of the experimental studies carried out in different regions of the country are proven by the fact that the use of microcirculation by drop irrigation method is well-aerated in the soil zone in the soil zone of the root system of plants, where normal biological activity of beneficial microorganisms is provided, it is ensured that the required amount of continuous fertilizer in the formulation of the solution provides optimal nutrient, water and air regimes in the soil, which in turn promotes biological and physical improvement of the plant and, consequently, increases productivity and improves product quality.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation improved aeration in the root zone and supported beneficial microorganisms.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- drop irrigation methode0
- Outcome
- well-aerated in the soil zonee0
- Direction
- well-aeratede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the use of microcirculation by drop irrigation method is well-aerated in the soil zone in the soil zone of the root system of plants, where normal biological activity of beneficial microorganisms is provided”
t0“costs of sugar beet productivity by macro and microelements”
Claim · model-written summary
Continuous fertilizer solution provided optimal soil nutrient, water, and air regimes.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- continuous fertilizer in the formulation of the solutione0
- Outcome
- optimal nutrient, water and air regimes in the soile0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the required amount of continuous fertilizer in the formulation of the solution provides optimal nutrient, water and air regimes in the soil”
t0“costs of sugar beet productivity by macro and microelements”
Claim · model-written summary
The described irrigation and fertilizer regime increased productivity and improved product quality.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- drop irrigation methode1
- Outcome
- productivity and improves product qualitye0
- Direction
- increasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“which in turn promotes biological and physical improvement of the plant and, consequently, increases productivity and improves product quality”
t0“costs of sugar beet productivity by macro and microelements”
e1“the use of microcirculation by drop irrigation method”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.