Paper · 2016 · PubMed

[Effect of biopesticide Pythium oligandrum broth on gummy stem blight in cucumber seedlings, animal health and plant growth].

Mingming Geng; Ruilian Jia; Zongming Sui; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Objective: Biopesticides are safe and environment friendly. We evaluated the biocontrol effect of Pythium oligandrum broth (POB) and its toxicity to animals and plant growth. Methods: Animal, antagonist, pot, and field experiments with mice, Mycosphaerella melonis, and cucumber seedlings were carried out to study animal toxicity, control of gummy stem blight, plant growth, fruit yield and quality with POB produced from self-isolated P. oligandrum CQ2010. Results: Mouse showed normal weight, appearances, performances and no pathogenic changes in organs and tissues with a large amount of POB supplied by lavage. The inhibition rate of POB against M. melonis was 51.95%, similar to thiophanate methy (800 times dilution) but much higher than chlorothalonil (200 times dilution). Malondialdehyde concentration was reduced whereas activities of peroxidase and superoxide dismutase were stimulated in seedling leaves irrespective of POB supplied before and after pathogenic inoculation. POB also decreased the pathogenic incidence and disease index with relative control efficacy from 54.8% to 64.1%. Thus, POB could alleviate cell membrane damage caused by pathogenic microbes, stimulate physiological reactions related to disease defense, and increase disease-resistant abilities of plants. Moreover, POB increased chlorophyll content, root activity, and uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, resulting in growth acceleration, fruit yield increment, and quality improvement. Conclusion: POB is safe to animals and could control gummy stem blight of cucumber seedlings, promote plant growth, increase fruit yield, and improve the qualities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The broth inhibited M. melonis by 51.95%, similar to thiophanate methy and higher than chlorothalonil.

Taxon
cucumber seedlingsCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
POBe0
Interactor
M. melonise0pathogen
Outcome
inhibition rate of POB against M. melonise0
Direction
much highere0
Value
51.95%e0
Comparator
thiophanate methye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibition rate of POB against M. melonis was 51.95%, similar to thiophanate methy (800 times dilution) but much higher than chlorothalonil (200 times dilution).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–782 · show in text ↑
e1

“and cucumber seedlings were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The broth reduced malondialdehyde concentration in seedling leaves.

Taxon
cucumber seedlingsCucumis sativuse1
Organ / stage
seedling leavese0
Treatment
POBe0
Outcome
Malondialdehyde concentratione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Malondialdehyde concentration was reduced whereas activities of peroxidase and superoxide dismutase were stimulated in seedling leaves irrespective of POB supplied before and after pathogenic inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“and cucumber seedlings were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The broth stimulated peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities in seedling leaves.

Taxon
cucumber seedlingsCucumis sativuse1
Organ / stage
seedling leavese0
Treatment
POBe0
Outcome
activities of peroxidase and superoxide dismutasee0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Malondialdehyde concentration was reduced whereas activities of peroxidase and superoxide dismutase were stimulated in seedling leaves irrespective of POB supplied before and after pathogenic inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“and cucumber seedlings were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The broth decreased pathogenic incidence and disease index, with 54.8% to 64.1% relative control efficacy.

Taxon
cucumber seedlingsCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
POBe0
Outcome
pathogenic incidence and disease indexe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
54.8% to 64.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“POB also decreased the pathogenic incidence and disease index with relative control efficacy from 54.8% to 64.1%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“and cucumber seedlings were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The broth increased chlorophyll content, root activity, and nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake.

Taxon
cucumber seedlingsCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
POBe0
Outcome
chlorophyll content, root activity, and uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassiume0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“POB increased chlorophyll content, root activity, and uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1402 · show in text ↑
e1

“and cucumber seedlings were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The broth accelerated growth and increased fruit yield and quality.

Taxon
cucumber seedlingsCucumis sativuse2
Treatment
POBe1
Outcome
growth acceleration, fruit yield increment, and quality improvemente0
Direction
incremente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in growth acceleration, fruit yield increment, and quality improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1484 · show in text ↑
e1

“POB increased chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1337 · show in text ↑
e2

“and cucumber seedlings were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–305 · show in text ↑

Pythium oligandrum · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.