Paper · 2001 · Acta Horticulturae

DISEASE SUPPRESSIVE SOILLESS CULTURE SYSTEMS; CHARACTERISATION OF ITS MICROFLORA

J. Postma; M.J.E.I.M. Willemsen-de Klein; H. Rattink; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The trend in glasshouse horticulture has always been to start culture systems as aseptic as possible. However, several root diseases still cause problems under these conditions. The present paper shows the importance of the microflora to suppress Pythium aphanidermatum, a fungal root pathogen which is a serious threat in cucumber. Introduced single antagonists as well as the indigenous microflora suppressed pythium root and crown rot. Pseudomonas fluorescens, Streptomyces griseoviridis, Pythium oligandrum, and 2 isolates of Trichoderma harzianum reduced the disease occurrence by 60 ␘r more in several, but not all, of the experiments. The indigenous microflora showed a very constant disease suppression of 50 to 100 &Eth;This was tested in experiments where P. aphanidermatum was added to sterilised and non-sterilised rockwool, and to sterilised rockwool that had been recolonised with the original microflora. Suppressiveness correlated with the number of filamentous actinomycetes present in the nutrient solution in the rockwool slabs. If a beneficial microflora is present in the cropping system, it should not be disturbed or eradicated by treatments such as disinfection of the recirculated nutrient solution. Therefore, the effects of different disinfection procedures on the composition of the microflora were compared. Numbers of filamentous actinomycetes in the nutrient solution in the tank after the disinfection treatment were highest without disinfection, intermediate after slow filtration, and lowest after UV treatment. Numbers of actinomycetes in the slabs, i.e. around the roots, were not distinctly different between the treatments. The implication of potential shifts in the microbial populations due to certain treatments for the disease development is not known. Increased knowledge on the beneficial microflora and the treatments that influence the composition of such a microflora, will stimulate the exploitation of microbially balanced and optimised soilless culture systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens reduced cucumber disease occurrence by 60 or more in several experiments.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease occurrencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas fluorescens, Streptomyces griseoviridis, Pythium oligandrum, and 2 isolates of Trichoderma harzianum reduced the disease occurrence by 60 ␘r more in several, but not all, of the experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“a serious threat in cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptomyces griseoviridis reduced disease occurrence by 60 or more in several experiments.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
Streptomyces griseoviridise0
Interactor
Streptomyces griseoviridisStreptomyces griseoviridise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease occurrencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas fluorescens, Streptomyces griseoviridis, Pythium oligandrum, and 2 isolates of Trichoderma harzianum reduced the disease occurrence by 60 ␘r more in several, but not all, of the experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“a serious threat in cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pythium oligandrum reduced disease occurrence by 60 or more in several experiments.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
Pythium oligandrume0
Interactor
Pythium oligandrumPythium oligandrume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease occurrencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pythium oligandrum
Pythium oligandrum · InteractorLordboldemort · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas fluorescens, Streptomyces griseoviridis, Pythium oligandrum, and 2 isolates of Trichoderma harzianum reduced the disease occurrence by 60 ␘r more in several, but not all, of the experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“a serious threat in cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two Trichoderma harzianum isolates reduced disease occurrence by 60 or more in several experiments.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
2 isolates of Trichoderma harzianume0
Interactor
Trichoderma harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease occurrencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas fluorescens, Streptomyces griseoviridis, Pythium oligandrum, and 2 isolates of Trichoderma harzianum reduced the disease occurrence by 60 ␘r more in several, but not all, of the experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“a serious threat in cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indigenous microflora consistently suppressed cucumber disease by 50 to 100.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
indigenous microflorae0
Interactor
indigenous microflorae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease suppressione0
Direction
suppressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The indigenous microflora showed a very constant disease suppression of 50 to 100 &Eth;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–729 · show in text ↑
e1

“a serious threat in cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–331 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Suppressiveness correlated with filamentous actinomycete numbers in rockwool nutrient solution.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Interactor
filamentous actinomycetese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Suppressivenesse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Suppressiveness correlated with the number of filamentous actinomycetes present in the nutrient solution in the rockwool slabs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1046 · show in text ↑
e1

“a serious threat in cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disinfection treatments ranked tank actinomycete numbers highest with no disinfection, intermediate after slow filtration and lowest after UV treatment.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
disinfection treatmente0
Interactor
filamentous actinomycetese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Numbers of filamentous actinomycetese0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
without disinfectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Numbers of filamentous actinomycetes in the nutrient solution in the tank after the disinfection treatment were highest without disinfection, intermediate after slow filtration, and lowest after UV treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1544 · show in text ↑
e1

“a serious threat in cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actinomycete numbers around roots were not distinctly different among disinfection treatments.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
treatmentse0
Interactor
actinomycetesActinomycetese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Numbers of actinomycetes in the slabse0
Direction
not distinctly differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Numbers of actinomycetes in the slabs, i.e. around the roots, were not distinctly different between the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1660 · show in text ↑
e1

“a serious threat in cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–331 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Beneficial microflora should not be disturbed or eradicated by disinfection.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Interactor
beneficial microflorae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
it should not be disturbed or eradicated by treatments such as disinfectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“If a beneficial microflora is present in the cropping system, it should not be disturbed or eradicated by treatments such as disinfection of the recirculated nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1223 · show in text ↑
e1

“a serious threat in cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–331 · show in text ↑

Pythium oligandrum · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.