Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Induced Tolerance Mechanism of Resistance in Rice to White Backed Plant Hopper through Zinc Application

Seema Tripathy; Ladu Kishore Rath

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A pot culture experiment was undertaken during kharif, 2017 on evaluation of induced mechanism of zinc in rice for expression of tolerance against white backed plant hopper (WBPH) in the Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar. It was revealed that basal application of Zn EDTA @ 40 kg/ha along with its foliar spray @ 0.8%, twice at 30 and 45 days after transplanting (DAT) (T6) expressed fair degree of tolerance against WBPH. Zinc application delayed the wilting in treated plants as compared to control under high pest load. The functional plant loss index and per cent loss in grain and straw weight were also minimum in zinc treated plants comprising basal and foliar application as compared to sole application and control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal and foliar zinc treatment gave rice a fair degree of WBPH tolerance.

Treatment
basal application of Zn EDTA @ 40 kg/ha along with its foliar spray @ 0.8%e0
Interactor
WBPHe0pest
Outcome
fair degree of tolerance against WBPHe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“basal application of Zn EDTA @ 40 kg/ha along with its foliar spray @ 0.8%, twice at 30 and 45 days after transplanting (DAT) (T6) expressed fair degree of tolerance against WBPH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application delayed wilting relative to control under high pest load.

Treatment
Zinc applicatione0
Interactor
white backed plant hopperSogatella furciferae1pest
Outcome
wiltinge0
Direction
delayede0
Qualifier
high pest loade0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc application delayed the wilting in treated plants as compared to control under high pest load”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“white backed plant hopper (WBPH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 147–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined basal and foliar zinc minimized functional plant loss index versus sole application and control.

Treatment
basal and foliar applicatione0
Outcome
functional plant loss indexe0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
sole application and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The functional plant loss index and per cent loss in grain and straw weight were also minimum in zinc treated plants comprising basal and foliar application as compared to sole application and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined basal and foliar zinc minimized grain and straw weight loss versus sole application and control.

Treatment
basal and foliar applicatione0
Outcome
per cent loss in grain and straw weighte0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
sole application and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The functional plant loss index and per cent loss in grain and straw weight were also minimum in zinc treated plants comprising basal and foliar application as compared to sole application and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 21 positive, 3 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

zinc atom · Sogatella furcifera · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 155 positive, 16 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

application · survival · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.