Paper · 2014 · Annals of Applied Biology

Effect of nutrient application and water turbidity on submergence tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa)

P. Gautam; B. Lal; R. Raja; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Flooding imposes severe selection pressure on plants, principally because excess water in their surroundings deprives the plants from certain basic resources such as oxygen, carbon dioxide and light for photosynthesis. Here, the effects of nitrogen and phosphorus application and their application time, on four Indica rice cultivars and their tolerance to submergence under turbid and clear flood water was studied. Submergence tolerance on metabolic changes, photosynthetic (Pn) rate and ethylene accumulation were evaluated. Submergence substantially reduced survival, chlorophyll, soluble sugars, Pn rate across cultivars with drastic reduction in IR ‐20. Sub1 cultivars showed greater Pn rate as compared to sensitive cultivar under submergence because of better protection of chlorophyll, more stomatal conductance leading to higher survival. Turbid water resulted in lower under‐water photosynthesis because of poor light transmission, chlorophyll retention and silt deposition and ultimately poor survival. Foliar spray of N after desubmergence along with basal P improved the chlorophyll, soluble sugars and Pn rate and extenuated ethylene accumulation and shoot elongation resulting in significantly higher survival. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that such a study has been performed. Crop establishment could therefore be enhanced in areas where untimely flooding is anticipated by applying basal P and foliar spray of post‐submergence N.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Submergence reduced survival, chlorophyll, soluble sugars and photosynthetic rate across cultivars, most sharply in IR ‐20.

Material
IR ‐20e0
Treatment
Submergencee0
Outcome
survival, chlorophyll, soluble sugars, Pn ratee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Submergence substantially reduced survival, chlorophyll, soluble sugars, Pn rate across cultivars with drastic reduction in IR ‐20.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–668 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sub1 cultivars had greater photosynthetic rate than a sensitive cultivar under submergence.

Material
Sub1 cultivarse0
Outcome
Pn ratee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
sensitive cultivare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sub1 cultivars showed greater Pn rate as compared to sensitive cultivar under submergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sub1 cultivars had better chlorophyll protection and more stomatal conductance, associated with higher survival.

Outcome
higher survivale0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
better protection of chlorophyll, more stomatal conductancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“because of better protection of chlorophyll, more stomatal conductance leading to higher survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turbid water lowered underwater photosynthesis.

Treatment
Turbid watere0
Outcome
under‐water photosynthesise0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
clear flood watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Turbid water resulted in lower under‐water photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“under turbid and clear flood water was studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turbid water led to poor survival.

Treatment
Turbid watere0
Outcome
survivale0
Direction
poore0
Comparator
clear flood watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Turbid water resulted in lower under‐water photosynthesis because of poor light transmission, chlorophyll retention and silt deposition and ultimately poor survival.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“under turbid and clear flood water was studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-submergence foliar nitrogen with basal phosphorus improved chlorophyll, soluble sugars and photosynthetic rate.

Treatment
Foliar spray of N after desubmergence along with basal Pe0
Outcome
chlorophyll, soluble sugars and Pn ratee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray of N after desubmergence along with basal P improved the chlorophyll, soluble sugars and Pn rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-submergence foliar nitrogen with basal phosphorus reduced ethylene accumulation and shoot elongation.

Treatment
Foliar spray of N after desubmergence along with basal Pe0
Outcome
ethylene accumulation and shoot elongatione0
Direction
extenuatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray of N after desubmergence along with basal P improved the chlorophyll, soluble sugars and Pn rate and extenuated ethylene accumulation and shoot elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-submergence foliar nitrogen with basal phosphorus significantly increased survival.

Treatment
Foliar spray of N after desubmergence along with basal Pe0
Outcome
survivale0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray of N after desubmergence along with basal P improved the chlorophyll, soluble sugars and Pn rate and extenuated ethylene accumulation and shoot elongation resulting in significantly higher survival.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend basal phosphorus and post-submergence foliar nitrogen where flooding is anticipated.

Outcome
applying basal P and foliar spray of post‐submergence Ne0
Qualifier
areas where untimely flooding is anticipatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop establishment could therefore be enhanced in areas where untimely flooding is anticipated by applying basal P and foliar spray of post‐submergence N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 8 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 46 positive, 1 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

application · survival · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · physiology: hormones · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.