Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Zinc Sulphate on Yield and Yield Attributes of Green Gram (Vigna radiata)

Prashant kumar; B. M. Radder

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment on the Response of greengram (Vigna radiata L.) to soil and foliar application of zinc sulphate” was conducted during khari 2016 at the Indian Institute of Pulse Research, Regional Centre,UAS, Dharwad. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with ten treatments including application of zinc sulphate @ 5, 7.5 and 10 kg ha-1 along with zinc sulphate spray @ 0.5 and 1 per cent at 20 DAS along with RDF and replicated trice. The results revealed that soil application of zinc sulphate 7.5 kg ha-1 + 0.5 per cent zinc sulphate spray at 20 DAS along with RDF (T6) was found superior in enhancing the grain yield (8.65q ha-1) and haulm yield (19.47 q ha-1) of greengram. Similarly, highest uptake of nutrients (N, P, K and Zn ) by the crop were recorded due to the soil application of zinc sulphate 7.5 kg ha-1 + 0.5 per cent zinc sulphate spray at 20 DAS along with RDF (T6)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 increased grain yield to 8.65 q ha-1.

Taxon
greengram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
soil application of zinc sulphate 7.5 kg ha-1 + 0.5 per cent zinc sulphate spray at 20 DAS along with RDF (T6)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancinge0
Value
8.65q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of zinc sulphate 7.5 kg ha-1 + 0.5 per cent zinc sulphate spray at 20 DAS along with RDF (T6) was found superior in enhancing the grain yield (8.65q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 increased haulm yield to 19.47 q ha-1.

Taxon
greengram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
soil application of zinc sulphate 7.5 kg ha-1 + 0.5 per cent zinc sulphate spray at 20 DAS along with RDF (T6)e0
Outcome
haulm yielde0
Direction
enhancinge0
Value
19.47 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of zinc sulphate 7.5 kg ha-1 + 0.5 per cent zinc sulphate spray at 20 DAS along with RDF (T6) was found superior in enhancing the grain yield (8.65q ha-1) and haulm yield (19.47 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–695 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 gave the highest crop nutrient uptake.

Taxon
greengram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
soil application of zinc sulphate 7.5 kg ha-1 + 0.5 per cent zinc sulphate spray at 20 DAS along with RDF (T6)e0
Outcome
uptake of nutrients (N, P, K and Zn )e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest uptake of nutrients (N, P, K and Zn ) by the crop were recorded due to the soil application of zinc sulphate 7.5 kg ha-1 + 0.5 per cent zinc sulphate spray at 20 DAS along with RDF (T6)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 38–66 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 76 positive, 3 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

29 papers: 29 positive, 0 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.