Paper · 2020 · Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences

EFFECT OF WATER STRESS ON RHIZOBIA SYMBIOSIS IN ALFALFA (MEDICAGO SATIVA L.)

Ahlem Mouffok; M. Belhamra

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The objective of this work was to highlight the responses to the low, moderate and severe water deficit of five varieties of alfalfa. The mechanisms studied focused on the relative water content, dry matter yield and symbiotic nitrogen fixation. The results obtained showed that the effects of water stress are manifested by a decrease in the relative water content and negatively affect vegetative growth as well as the symbiotic nitrogen fixation. The varieties studied behave differently depending on the severity of stress. However, the Diamant and Baldia varieties proved the most tolerant to the different degrees of water deficit. On the other hand, the varieties Dista and Moapa showed a significant sensitivity to the lack of water. This study could be used to define relevant criteria for drought resistance that can be used in varietal selection.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress decreased relative water content.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results obtained showed that the effects of water stress are manifested by a decrease in the relative water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–365 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress negatively affected vegetative growth.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
negatively affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress are manifested by a decrease in the relative water content and negatively affect vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–405 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress negatively affected symbiotic nitrogen fixation.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Treatment
water stresse0
Interactor
RHIZOBIAt0symbiont
Outcome
symbiotic nitrogen fixatione0
Direction
negatively affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress are manifested by a decrease in the relative water content and negatively affect vegetative growth as well as the symbiotic nitrogen fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–448 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATER STRESS ON RHIZOBIA SYMBIOSIS IN ALFALFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Varietal responses differed by stress severity.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Material
varietiese0
Outcome
behave differentlye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The varieties studied behave differently depending on the severity of stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–527 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diamant was among the most tolerant varieties across water deficit levels.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Material
Diamante0
Outcome
tolerante0
Direction
most tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Diamant and Baldia varieties proved the most tolerant to the different degrees of water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baldia was among the most tolerant varieties across water deficit levels.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Material
Baldiae0
Outcome
tolerante0
Direction
most tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Diamant and Baldia varieties proved the most tolerant to the different degrees of water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dista showed significant sensitivity to water deficit.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Material
Distae0
Outcome
sensitivity to the lack of watere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the varieties Dista and Moapa showed a significant sensitivity to the lack of water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moapa showed significant sensitivity to water deficit.

Taxon
ALFALFAMedicago sativat0
Material
Moapae0
Outcome
sensitivity to the lack of watere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the varieties Dista and Moapa showed a significant sensitivity to the lack of water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“ALFALFA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

72 papers: 20 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 9 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

drought · symbiosis · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

11 papers: 0 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.