Paper · 2020 · Journal of Plant Production

Response of Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of Squash Plants to Foliar Application with Potassium Silicate and Magnesium Sulfate under High Temperature Stress

M. Nada; E. Metwaly

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present study aimed to improve the green color degree of fruits under high temperature stress during this period of cultivation (beginning of July) as well as to enhance the productivity of squash cv. Esqania by using foliar spray with potassium silicate and magnesium sulfate. In the field experiment, squash plants were sprayed with potassium silicate at rates of 0, 250, 500 and 750ppm and magnesium sulfate at rates of 0, 1000 and 2000 ppm. These field experiments were performed at a private farm in Dekerness district, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt, in summer seasons of 2018 and 2019. The obtained results referred to that increasing potassium silicate rates from 250 up to 750 ppm gradually increased plant growth, leaf pigments, fruit yield and fruit quality parameters. The best treatment in this regard was 750ppm of potassium silicate compared to other rates. In addition, magnesium sulfate at 2000ppm recorded significantly increase in the above mentioned parameters of squash plant compared to the other one under study. The highest values of all the measured parameters were obtained from the potassium silicate rate of 750ppm combined with magnesium sulfate rate at 2000 ppm compared to control during both seasons. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that using of potassium silicate and magnesium sulfate as foliar application improved squash plants growth and productivity and fruits green color degree may be attributed to the physical role of the silicon as well as magnesium on enhancing chlorophyll formation or both under heat stress condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium silicate increased growth and leaf pigments.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
potassium silicate rates from 250 up to 750 ppme0
Outcome
plant growth, leaf pigmentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increasing potassium silicate rates from 250 up to 750 ppm gradually increased plant growth, leaf pigments, fruit yield and fruit quality parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium silicate increased fruit yield and quality.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
potassium silicate rates from 250 up to 750 ppme0
Outcome
fruit yield and fruit quality parameterse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increasing potassium silicate rates from 250 up to 750 ppm gradually increased plant growth, leaf pigments, fruit yield and fruit quality parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 750 ppm potassium silicate rate was best.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
750ppm of potassium silicatee0
Outcome
best treatmente0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
other ratese0

Verbatim

e0

“The best treatment in this regard was 750ppm of potassium silicate compared to other rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–873 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium sulfate at 2000 ppm significantly increased measured parameters.

Taxon
squashe0
Treatment
magnesium sulfate at 2000ppme0
Outcome
above mentioned parameterse0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
the other one under studye0

Verbatim

e0

“magnesium sulfate at 2000ppm recorded significantly increase in the above mentioned parameters of squash plant compared to the other one under study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatments yielded the highest measured parameters against control.

Taxon
Squasht0
Treatment
potassium silicate rate of 750ppm combined with magnesium sulfate rate at 2000 ppme0
Outcome
all the measured parameterse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values of all the measured parameters were obtained from the potassium silicate rate of 750ppm combined with magnesium sulfate rate at 2000 ppm compared to control during both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“Squash Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–60 · show in text ↑

silicate(4-) · quality: grain · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

silicate(4-) · physiology: pigments · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

potassium · quality: grain · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

potassium · physiology: pigments · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.