Paper · 2020 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Evaluation of antifungal activity of Bacillus spp. against Fusarium oxysporum and Rhizoctonia solani in Chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Mamta; Monika Singh; Neetu Pandey

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Bacillus isolates were evaluated for their antagonistic activities against Fusarium oxysporum and Rhizoctonia solani from chick pea rhizosphere and their compatibility with Fusarium oxysporum and Rhizoctonia solani.Bacillus B1 isolate showed 53.3% inhibition and Bacillus N2(2) showed 41.7% inhibition against R. solani. Compatibility of fungicides with B1 and N2(2), Bacillus isolates was checked using turbidometric method, disc method and poisoned food method. Both isolates were found compatible with different fungicides concentration. Both isolates when incorporated as seed treatment, increased germination percentage, root/shoot length and vigour index. Out of 5 fungicides, maximum tolerance concentration and maximum inhibition centration was found to be more concentration by Carbendazim.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus B1 isolate showed 53.3% inhibition against Rhizoctonia solani.

Taxon
Chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus B1 isolatee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibitione1
Value
53.3%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus B1 isolate showed 53.3% inhibition and Bacillus N2(2) showed 41.7% inhibition against R. solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–319 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus N2(2) showed 41.7% inhibition against Rhizoctonia solani.

Taxon
Chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus N2(2)e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibitione1
Value
41.7%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus B1 isolate showed 53.3% inhibition and Bacillus N2(2) showed 41.7% inhibition against R. solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus isolates applied as seed treatment increased chickpea germination percentage, root/shoot length and vigour index.

Taxon
Chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
incorporated as seed treatmente2
Interactor
Bacillus isolatese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
germination percentage, root/shoot length and vigour indexe2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bacillus isolates were evaluated for their antagonistic activities against Fusarium oxysporum and Rhizoctonia solani from chick pea rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both isolates when incorporated as seed treatment, increased germination percentage, root/shoot length and vigour index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim had the highest maximum tolerance concentration and maximum inhibition concentration among the five fungicides tested with Bacillus isolates.

Taxon
Chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Carbendazime3
Outcome
maximum tolerance concentration and maximum inhibition centratione3
Direction
more concentratione3
Comparator
Out of 5 fungicidese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–134 · show in text ↑
e3

“Out of 5 fungicides, maximum tolerance concentration and maximum inhibition centration was found to be more concentration by Carbendazim”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–798 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both Bacillus isolates were compatible with different fungicide concentrations.

Taxon
Chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Outcome
compatible with different fungicides concentratione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–134 · show in text ↑
e4

“Both isolates were found compatible with different fungicides concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–539 · show in text ↑

carbendazim · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

81 papers: 76 positive, 5 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.