Paper · 2020 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Leaf composition and productivity of yellow passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims. “Guinezinho”) in soil with bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen

Adriana Araújo Diniz; Lourival Ferreira Cavalcante; Antônio Gustavo de Luna Souto; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The use of alternative inputs, derived from the fermentation of fresh organic matter, exerts significant importance in the pasiculture in partial substitution to synthetic commercial fertilizers. An experiment was conducted in the period from 2013 to 2014 to evaluate the effects of bovine biofertilizer and nitrogen, on leaf mineral composition of macronutrients, micronutrients and sodium and productivity of yellow passion fruit. The treatments were arranged in randomized blocks with three replicates and nine plants per plot. We arranged a 5 × 2 factorial scheme, referring to the bovine biofertilizer applied to the soil in the liquid form (B) in the proportions in water (W) of 0 (0B + 4W); 25 (1B + 3W); 50 (2B + 2W); 75 (3B + 1W) and 100% (4B + 0W), in the soil without and with nitrogen. The seedlings were developed from fruit seeds with large size, oblique shape and mass. The bovine biofertilizer was applied at 4 L plant-1 in water, 7 days before and 90 days after transplanting of 50-day-old seedlings. The nitrogen was applied to the relevant plots every 30 days after transplantation of the seedlings until the end of the experiment. The resulrs showed that plants were adequately supplied in N, Mg, S, B, Cu and Zn, but deficient in P, K, Ca, Cu, Fe and Mn at the beginning of flowering. The highest fruit production of 30.75 t ha 1 were obtained from the plants in soil with 100% of bovine biofertilizer and with nitrogen. Due to the higher fruit productivity in plants with biofertilizer bovine + nitrogen, compared to those treated with only bovine biofertilizer, it is verified that the organic input does not substitute the nitrogen for the cultivation of the yellow passion fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants were adequately supplied with six named nutrients at flowering.

Taxon
yellow passion fruitt0
Organ / stage
floweringe0
Outcome
adequately supplied in N, Mg, S, B, Cu and Zne0

Verbatim

t0

“yellow passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims. “Guinezinho”)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“plants were adequately supplied in N, Mg, S, B, Cu and Zn, but deficient in P, K, Ca, Cu, Fe and Mn at the beginning of flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1304 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants were deficient in six named nutrients at flowering.

Taxon
yellow passion fruitt0
Organ / stage
floweringe0
Outcome
deficient in P, K, Ca, Cu, Fe and Mne0

Verbatim

t0

“yellow passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims. “Guinezinho”)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“deficient in P, K, Ca, Cu, Fe and Mn at the beginning of flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full biofertilizer plus nitrogen produced the highest fruit yield of 30.75 t ha 1.

Taxon
yellow passion fruitt0
Treatment
100% of bovine biofertilizer and with nitrogene0
Outcome
fruit productione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
30.75 t ha 1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“yellow passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims. “Guinezinho”)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest fruit production of 30.75 t ha 1 were obtained from the plants in soil with 100% of bovine biofertilizer and with nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer plus nitrogen yielded more fruit than biofertilizer alone.

Taxon
yellow passion fruitt0
Treatment
biofertilizer bovine + nitrogene0
Outcome
fruit productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
only bovine biofertilizere0

Verbatim

t0

“yellow passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims. “Guinezinho”)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher fruit productivity in plants with biofertilizer bovine + nitrogen, compared to those treated with only bovine biofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1583 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that biofertilizer does not replace nitrogen in passion fruit cultivation.

Taxon
yellow passion fruitt0
Outcome
organic input does not substitute the nitrogene0

Verbatim

t0

“yellow passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims. “Guinezinho”)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“the organic input does not substitute the nitrogen for the cultivation of the yellow passion fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1703 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.