Abstract
Roller-crimping of cover crops grown during winter may facilitate reduced tillage efforts in organic vegetable production. A one-year field experiment was conducted twice (autumn 2015–2017) in sandy loam soil in Denmark testing two cover crop termination systems, roller-crimping (RC) without tillage before crop planting, and full incorporation by tillage (FI) of mowed cover crops in organic white cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. convar. capitata var. capitata f. alba) production. Three legume species were investigated: winter faba bean (Vicia faba L.), winter pea (Pisum sativum L.), hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth), in pure stands or in a mixture with winter rye (Secale cereale L.). Roller-crimping reduced total white cabbage biomass by 31% (2016) and 19% (2017). Marketable white cabbage yield was 100% (2016) or 24% (2017) lower under RC than FI, likely caused by delayed N release from cover crops and reduced soil dehydrogenase activity. White cabbage root growth was reduced by RC following pea/rye, where N availability was low. Despite reduced root growth and yield, RC still had the advantage of reducing weed growth by 63% compared with FI three weeks after cover crop termination in 2017 and of decreasing N leaching risk, indicated by reduced soil mineral N content in 0.5–1.5 m depth in autumn. Marketable yield was 35% higher following legumes compared with legume/rye mixtures in both termination systems in 2017, due to 105 kg N ha−1 higher mineral soil N content in 0–2.5 m depth in the spring and faster N mineralisation from plant material with a lower C/N ratio. This yield increase corresponded with increased root growth following RC legumes. In contrast, legume/rye mixtures had the advantage of decreasing weed growth by 50–68% and N leaching risk by 22 kg ha−1 in 0.5−2 m depth. Although RC demonstrated ecological benefits such as weed suppression and indicated reduced N leaching risk, the trade-off with yield losses could create a barrier to adoption. This trade-off could be mitigated by using pure legume cover crops and by improving management of supplemental N fertility.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Roller crimping reduced cabbage biomass by 31% in 2016.
Verbatim
e0“Roller-crimping reduced total white cabbage biomass by 31% (2016)”
e1“full incorporation by tillage (FI)”
Claim · model-written summary
Roller crimping reduced cabbage biomass by 19% in 2017.
Verbatim
e0“Roller-crimping reduced total white cabbage biomass by 31% (2016) and 19% (2017)”
e1“full incorporation by tillage (FI)”
Claim · model-written summary
Marketable cabbage yield was 100% lower under roller crimping than incorporation in 2016.
Verbatim
e0“Marketable white cabbage yield was 100% (2016) or 24% (2017) lower under RC than FI”
Claim · model-written summary
Marketable cabbage yield was 24% lower under roller crimping than incorporation in 2017.
Verbatim
e0“Marketable white cabbage yield was 100% (2016) or 24% (2017) lower under RC than FI”
Claim · model-written summary
Roller crimping after pea and rye reduced cabbage root growth.
Verbatim
e0“White cabbage root growth was reduced by RC following pea/rye, where N availability was low”
e1“full incorporation by tillage (FI)”
Claim · model-written summary
Roller crimping reduced weed growth by 63% relative to incorporation.
Verbatim
e0“RC still had the advantage of reducing weed growth by 63% compared with FI three weeks after cover crop termination in 2017”
t0“white cabbage”
Claim · model-written summary
Roller crimping lowered autumn soil mineral N, indicating lower leaching risk.
Verbatim
e0“decreasing N leaching risk, indicated by reduced soil mineral N content in 0.5–1.5 m depth in autumn”
t0“white cabbage”
e1“RC still had the advantage of reducing weed growth by 63% compared with FI”
Claim · model-written summary
Marketable cabbage yield was 35% higher after pure legumes than legume rye mixtures.
Verbatim
e0“Marketable yield was 35% higher following legumes compared with legume/rye mixtures in both termination systems in 2017”
t0“white cabbage”
Claim · model-written summary
Pure legumes had 105 kg N ha−1 more spring mineral soil N than mixtures.
Verbatim
e0“105 kg N ha−1 higher mineral soil N content in 0–2.5 m depth in the spring”
t0“white cabbage”
e1“following legumes compared with legume/rye mixtures”
Claim · model-written summary
Cabbage root growth increased after roller crimped pure legumes.
Verbatim
e0“This yield increase corresponded with increased root growth following RC legumes”
t0“white cabbage”
e1“following legumes compared with legume/rye mixtures”
Claim · model-written summary
Legume rye mixtures reduced weed growth by 50–68%.
Verbatim
e0“legume/rye mixtures had the advantage of decreasing weed growth by 50–68%”
t0“white cabbage”
e1“following legumes compared with legume/rye mixtures”
Claim · model-written summary
Legume rye mixtures reduced N leaching risk by 22 kg ha−1.
Verbatim
e0“N leaching risk by 22 kg ha−1 in 0.5−2 m depth”
t0“white cabbage”
e1“legume/rye mixtures had the advantage of decreasing weed growth by 50–68% and N leaching risk”
e2“following legumes compared with legume/rye mixtures”