Paper · 2018 · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica

Soil enzyme activity and sulphur uptake by oilseed rape depending on fertilization and biostimulant application Section B Soil and plant science

Anetta Siwik-Ziomek; Małgorzata Szczepanek

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Purpose Besides nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, sulphur is nowadays considered fundamental for plants, and due to its deficit in many regions, should be provided to crops by fertilization. The enzymes, rhodanese and arylsulphatase, take part in transforming sulphur in soil. Material and methods The seaweed biostimulant Kelpak (auxins 11 mg l ⁻¹ and cytokinins 0.031 mg l ⁻¹) was applied to increase the uptake and accumulation of sulphur affecting the yield of oilseed rape cv. ‘Chagall’. Field experiments were conducted in Poland (53°N.18°E), in Alfisol (USDA) over 2010–2013. In the experiment, the nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus rate applied was as follows: high: 180 N, 70 P, 132 K [kg ha ⁻¹] or low: 144 N, 35 P, 66 K [kg ha ⁻¹], fertilization rate with elemental S (36 or 0 kg ha ⁻¹) and with biostimulant (Kelpak 2 l ha ⁻¹ in autumn and 2 l ha ⁻¹ in spring) or without it. Results There was found no relevant effect of biostimulant on the activity of the enzymes studied. With a low sulphates content in soil during ripening the rape, the activity of arylsulphatase increases. The highest rate of NPK resulted in a 27-42% increase in the content of SO ₄²⁻ in soil as compared with the soil sampled from NPK fertilization at lower rates. Sulphur recovery efficiency from fertilizer with S elemental increased for higher NPK fertilization. Conclusions Biostimulant application can compensate for a low level of oilseed rape crops cultivation technology (low rates of NPK fertilization) by improving the use of S from a fertilizer. In growing oilseed rape, it is essential to correlate the management of NPK and S fertilization at the right rate for a high sulphur recovery efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulant application had no relevant effect on the activity of the soil enzymes studied in oilseed rape fields.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Treatment
biostimulante2
Gene
rhodanese and arylsulphatasee4
Outcome
activity of the enzymes studiede2
Direction
no relevant effecte2
Comparator
without ite3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“There was found no relevant effect of biostimulant on the activity of the enzymes studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–988 · show in text ↑
e3

“or without it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–889 · show in text ↑
e4

“The enzymes, rhodanese and arylsulphatase, take part in transforming sulphur in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–277 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With low sulphate content in soil during ripening, arylsulphatase activity in oilseed rape fields increased.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Organ / stage
ripeninge2
Treatment
low sulphates content in soile2
Outcome
activity of arylsulphatasee2
Direction
increasese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“With a low sulphates content in soil during ripening the rape, the activity of arylsulphatase increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest NPK rate increased soil sulphate content by 27-42% in oilseed rape fields compared with lower NPK rates.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Treatment
highest rate of NPKe2
Outcome
content of SO ₄²⁻ in soile2
Direction
increasee2
Value
27-42%e2
Comparator
NPK fertilization at lower ratese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest rate of NPK resulted in a 27-42% increase in the content of SO ₄²⁻ in soil as compared with the soil sampled from NPK fertilization at lower rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1253 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur recovery efficiency from S elemental fertilizer increased with higher NPK fertilization in oilseed rape.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Treatment
higher NPK fertilizatione2
Outcome
Sulphur recovery efficiency from fertilizer with S elementale2
Direction
increasede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sulphur recovery efficiency from fertilizer with S elemental increased for higher NPK fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1354 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulant application improved the use of fertilizer S in oilseed rape grown with low NPK rates.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Treatment
Biostimulant applicatione2
Outcome
use of S from a fertilizere2
Direction
improvinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“Biostimulant application can compensate for a low level of oilseed rape crops cultivation technology (low rates of NPK fertilization) by improving the use of S from a fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1545 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend correlating NPK and S fertilization management at the right rate for high sulphur recovery efficiency in oilseed rape.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse1
Outcome
management of NPK and S fertilizatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“In growing oilseed rape, it is essential to correlate the management of NPK and S fertilization at the right rate for a high sulphur recovery efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1699 · show in text ↑

other · physiology: enzyme activity · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.