Paper · 1985 · Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System)

DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE OF CORN HYBRIDS TO APPLIED NITROGEN (EFFICIENCY UPTAKE)

Stephen Earl Hawkins

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Efficient use of fertilizer inputs in corn production is a major concern with corn producers in keeping costs to a minimum. Selecting an efficient system to utilize nitrogen fertilizers would address application methods, formulation, tillage, climate, and cropping history. Another factor is the variation between genotypic response of corn hybrids to nitrogen. This study was designed to examine six hybrids at eight nitrogen treatments while previous studies have utilized two or three regimes. Three of the N treatments used in this experiment were split into a preplant treatment with 67 kg N ha('-1) of the total amount applied just prior to tasseling. Grain and stover yield and N content was examined to determine overall nitrogen use efficiency and uptake and utilization characteristics during the growing season. The overall efficiency of nitrogen use declined as nitrogen rates were increased in all hybrids, but two hybrids exhibited the inability to translate increased rates of applied nitrogen into increased grain yield. Differences in nitrogen uptake and utilization characteristics existing between corn hybrids may not be pronounced enough with existing genotypes to manage except in high nitrogen loss situations. A second study was conducted with twenty hybrids to attempt to evaluate their responsiveness to applied N and split applications of N. The hybrids used in general responded to increasing N rates at both locations. Split applications of N did not result in increased yields at either location. In summary, this work has shown that some differences do exist between commercial hybrids currently being grown as to their response to applied N.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency declined as nitrogen rates rose across all corn hybrids.

Treatment
nitrogen ratese0
Outcome
efficiency of nitrogen usee0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
all hybridse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The overall efficiency of nitrogen use declined as nitrogen rates were increased in all hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two corn hybrids did not convert increased nitrogen application into increased grain yield.

Material
two hybridse0
Treatment
increased rates of applied nitrogene0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
inability to translatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two hybrids exhibited the inability to translate increased rates of applied nitrogen into increased grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second study, hybrids generally responded to increasing nitrogen rates at both locations.

Treatment
increasing N ratese0
Outcome
respondede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hybrids used in general responded to increasing N rates at both locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1447 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split nitrogen applications did not increase yields at either location.

Treatment
Split applications of Ne0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
did not result in increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Split applications of N did not result in increased yields at either location.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial corn hybrids differed in their response to applied nitrogen.

Material
commercial hybridse0
Outcome
differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some differences do exist between commercial hybrids currently being grown as to their response to applied N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1672 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–29 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,906 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.