Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The variable yield goal zone strategy returned $18.21 to $29.57 per hectare more than uniform management.

A claim from Economic Feasibility of Variable‐Rate Nitrogen Application Utilizing Site‐Specific Management Zones · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The variable yield goal zone strategy returned $18.21 to $29.57 per hectare more than uniform management.

Treatment
SSMZ‐VYG N management strategye0
Outcome
Net returnse0
Direction
moree0
Value
$18.21 to $29.57 ha −1e0
Comparator
uniform N managemente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net returns from the SSMZ‐VYG N management strategy were $18.21 to $29.57 ha −1 more than uniform N management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1178
t0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–448

Title

Economic Feasibility of Variable‐Rate Nitrogen Application Utilizing Site‐Specific Management Zones

B. Koch; R. Khosla; W. M. Frasier; et al. Agronomy Journal 2004. doi:10.2134/agronj2004.1572

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-e6f84234d7fb55f77cc393f3e246316a206dc4dee140630bf08a33b34376a597 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this claim · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

2,176 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.