Paper · 2012 · Journal of Plant Production

GROWTH, NUTRIENTS UPTAKE AND GRAIN YIELD OF SOME WHEAT CULTIVARS AS AFFECTED BY ZINC APPLICATION UNDER SANDY SOIL CONDITIONS

A. El-Metwally; N. Khalil; M. El-Fouly; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at Ismailia Exp. Sta., Agric. Res. Center, Ismailia governorate, during 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 seasons to study the influence of zinc application on growth, yield and yield components of some wheat (Triticum aesitivum L.) cultivars (Sakha-93, Sakha-94, Giza-168, Gemmeiza-9 and Gemmeiza-10). Three levels of Zn were applied: 0.0 (control), 1.5 and 3.0 kg Zn per Fed. Results showed that positive significant effects on growth traits, grain yield and its attributes was achieved by fertilizing wheat cultivars with 3.0 kg Zn/fed. Also, application of 3.0 kg Zn/fed. showed the highest values of P, K, Zn and Fe of shoot content. The largest flag leaf area was that of Sakha-93 and Gemmeiza-9 while, Giza-168 had superior shoot dry weight. Sakha-94 cultivar significantly surpasses all cultivars in plant height, while Gemmeiza-10 gave the highest number of spikes/m2, while 1000-grain weight of Sakha-93 was the largest. The highest grain yield was achieved with Sakha-94 and Gemmeiza-9.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 3.0 kg Zn/fed had positive significant effects on growth traits, grain yield and its attributes of wheat compared with the control.

Treatment
3.0 kg Zn/fede1
Outcome
growth traits, grain yield and its attributese1
Direction
positivee1
Comparator
0.0 (control)e0
Setting
Ismailia governoratee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SOME WHEAT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Three levels of Zn were applied: 0.0 (control), 1.5 and 3.0 kg Zn per Fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–405 · show in text ↑
e2

“Ismailia Exp. Sta., Agric. Res. Center, Ismailia governorate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“positive significant effects on growth traits, grain yield and its attributes was achieved by fertilizing wheat cultivars with 3.0 kg Zn/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 3.0 kg Zn/fed gave the highest values of P, K, Zn and Fe in wheat shoot content.

Organ / stage
shoote3
Treatment
application of 3.0 kg Zn/fede3
Outcome
values of P, K, Zn and Fe of shoot contente3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SOME WHEAT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of 3.0 kg Zn/fed. showed the highest values of P, K, Zn and Fe of shoot content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–666 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha-93 and Gemmeiza-9 had the largest flag leaf area among the wheat cultivars.

Material
Sakha-93 and Gemmeiza-9e4
Organ / stage
flag leafe4
Outcome
flag leaf areae4
Direction
largeste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SOME WHEAT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 · show in text ↑
e4

“The largest flag leaf area was that of Sakha-93 and Gemmeiza-9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–730 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza-168 had superior shoot dry weight among the wheat cultivars.

Material
Giza-168e5
Organ / stage
shoote5
Outcome
shoot dry weighte5
Direction
superiore5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SOME WHEAT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 · show in text ↑
e5

“Giza-168 had superior shoot dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–776 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha-94 significantly surpassed all other wheat cultivars in plant height.

Material
Sakha-94e6
Outcome
plant heighte6
Direction
surpassese6
Comparator
all cultivarse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SOME WHEAT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 · show in text ↑
e6

“Sakha-94 cultivar significantly surpasses all cultivars in plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–849 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gemmeiza-10 gave the highest number of spikes per square metre among the wheat cultivars.

Material
Gemmeiza-10e7
Outcome
number of spikes/m2e7
Direction
higheste7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SOME WHEAT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 · show in text ↑
e7

“Gemmeiza-10 gave the highest number of spikes/m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–905 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha-93 had the largest 1000-grain weight among the wheat cultivars.

Material
Sakha-93e0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
largeste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SOME WHEAT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“1000-grain weight of Sakha-93 was the largest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–958 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha-94 and Gemmeiza-9 gave the highest grain yield among the wheat cultivars.

Material
Sakha-94 and Gemmeiza-9e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SOME WHEAT CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest grain yield was achieved with Sakha-94 and Gemmeiza-9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1025 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.