Paper · 2020 · Horticulturae

Effect of Seaweed Extract on Productivity and Quality Attributes of Four Onion Cultivars

Mazhar Abbas; Jahanzeb Anwar; Muhammad Zafar-ul-Hye; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
103
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The excessive use of chemicals and inorganic fertilizers by farmers to increase crop yield is detrimental to the environment and human health. Application of biostimulants such as seaweed extract (SWE) in agriculture could be an effective and eco-friendly alternative to inorganic fertilizers. Biostimulants are natural organic degradable substances. Their application serves as a source of nutrition for crops, possibly improving growth and productivity when applied in combination with the fertilizers. The current study was conducted to evaluate the vegetative growth, reproductive behavior and quality attributes of four onion cultivars, ‘Lambada’, ‘Red Bone’, ‘Nasarpuri’, and ‘Phulkara’, in response to different concentrations of commercial SWE. Four levels of SWE extract were used, 0% (control), 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 3%, which were applied as a foliar spray to each cultivar. The application of 0.5% SWE caused a significant increase in total soluble solids, mineral content (N, P, and K), bulb weight and yield. Application at 3% SWE increased ascorbic acid as compared to control. The cultivars responded in different ways regarding bulb dry weight and bulb and neck diameter. Among all cultivars, ‘Lambada’ showed the maximum bulb dry matter, ‘Phulkara’ showed enhanced neck diameter whereas ‘Red Bone’ showed maximum leaf length. It is concluded that 0.5% SWE increased the yield, nutrient contents, and total soluble solids (TSS) of the four onion cultivars whereas 3% SWE, the highest concentration, increased ascorbic acid in different onion cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 0.5% seaweed extract significantly increased total soluble solids and mineral content (N, P, K) of onion compared with control.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
0.5% SWEe1
Outcome
total soluble solids, mineral content (N, P, and K)e1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Four Onion Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of 0.5% SWE caused a significant increase in total soluble solids, mineral content (N, P, and K), bulb weight and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1017 · show in text ↑
e2

“Four levels of SWE extract were used, 0% (control), 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 0.5% seaweed extract significantly increased bulb weight and yield of onion compared with control.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
0.5% SWEe1
Outcome
bulb weight and yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Four Onion Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of 0.5% SWE caused a significant increase in total soluble solids, mineral content (N, P, and K), bulb weight and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1017 · show in text ↑
e2

“Four levels of SWE extract were used, 0% (control), 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 3% seaweed extract increased ascorbic acid of onion compared with control.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
3% SWEe3
Outcome
ascorbic acide3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Four Onion Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“Four levels of SWE extract were used, 0% (control), 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–825 · show in text ↑
e3

“Application at 3% SWE increased ascorbic acid as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1087 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The onion cultivars responded in different ways for bulb dry weight and bulb and neck diameter.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Outcome
bulb dry weight and bulb and neck diametere4
Qualifier
responded in different wayse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Four Onion Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–88 · show in text ↑
e4

“The cultivars responded in different ways regarding bulb dry weight and bulb and neck diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1183 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Lambada had the maximum bulb dry matter among the four onion cultivars.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Material
Lambadae5
Outcome
bulb dry mattere5
Qualifier
maximume5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Four Onion Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–88 · show in text ↑
e5

“Lambada’ showed the maximum bulb dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1250 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Phulkara showed enhanced neck diameter among the four onion cultivars.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Material
Phulkarae6
Outcome
neck diametere6
Qualifier
enhancede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Four Onion Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–88 · show in text ↑
e6

“Phulkara’ showed enhanced neck diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Red Bone showed maximum leaf length among the four onion cultivars.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Material
Red Bonee7
Outcome
leaf lengthe7
Qualifier
maximume7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Four Onion Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–88 · show in text ↑
e7

“Red Bone’ showed maximum leaf length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1338 · show in text ↑

other · quality: sugar starch · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

other · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 44 positive, 4 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

other · quality: phytochemicals · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.