Paper · 2020 · Cogent Food & Agriculture

Symbiotic effectiveness of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) nodulating rhizobia isolated from soils of major cowpea producing areas in Ethiopia

Erana Kebede; Berhanu Amsalu; Anteneh Argaw; et al.

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Isolation and evaluation of symbiotic effectiveness of native rhizobia isolates are important to develop effective inoculant and achieve maximum legume productivity. This work was initiated to authenticate and evaluate the symbiotic effectiveness of cowpea nodulating rhizobia isolates isolated from major cowpea growing areas in Ethiopia. A total of 28 rhizobia isolates were isolated, purified, authenticated for infectiveness and assessed for their symbiotic effectiveness. The study was conducted under a controlled greenhouse condition and all isolates formed nodules on cowpea upon reinoculation and verified to be true rhizobia infecting their host. The inoculation of native rhizobia isolates had significantly increased nodule number per plant, nodule dry weight per plant and shoot dry weight per plant compared with the uninoculated treatment. The relative symbiotic effectiveness of the isolates ranged from 45.81% to 115.03% whereas the absolute symbiotic efficiency ranged from 32.72 to 233.25%. Besides, symbiotic effectiveness showed positive and highly significant correlation with nodule number, nodule dry weight and shoot dry weight per plant. The study on symbiotic effectiveness of the isolates revealed that 10 isolates (35.72%) were highly effective, 16 isolates (57.14%) were effective and only two isolates (7.14%) were poorly effective. From the study, it was observed that the existence of naturally occurring cowpea nodulating rhizobia varied from poorly to highly effective with a predominance of effective isolates in different agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia where cowpea is under production. Further studies are recommended under varied conditions on the competitiveness, persistence, and potential of the promising isolates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested rhizobia isolates formed nodules on cowpea after reinoculation.

Treatment
reinoculatione0
Interactor
rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
formed nodulese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all isolates formed nodules on cowpea upon reinoculation and verified to be true rhizobia infecting their host”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Native rhizobia inoculation significantly increased cowpea nodule number per plant versus uninoculated plants.

Treatment
inoculation of native rhizobia isolatese0
Interactor
native rhizobia isolatese0symbiont
Outcome
nodule number per plante0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
uninoculated treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation of native rhizobia isolates had significantly increased nodule number per plant, nodule dry weight per plant and shoot dry weight per plant compared with the uninoculated treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Native rhizobia inoculation significantly increased cowpea nodule dry weight per plant versus uninoculated plants.

Treatment
inoculation of native rhizobia isolatese0
Interactor
native rhizobia isolatese0symbiont
Outcome
nodule dry weight per plante0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
uninoculated treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation of native rhizobia isolates had significantly increased nodule number per plant, nodule dry weight per plant and shoot dry weight per plant compared with the uninoculated treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Native rhizobia inoculation significantly increased cowpea shoot dry weight per plant versus uninoculated plants.

Treatment
inoculation of native rhizobia isolatese0
Interactor
native rhizobia isolatese0symbiont
Outcome
shoot dry weight per plante0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
uninoculated treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation of native rhizobia isolates had significantly increased nodule number per plant, nodule dry weight per plant and shoot dry weight per plant compared with the uninoculated treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative symbiotic effectiveness of cowpea rhizobia isolates ranged from 45.81% to 115.03%.

Interactor
isolatese0symbiont
Outcome
relative symbiotic effectivenesse0
Value
45.81% to 115.03%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative symbiotic effectiveness of the isolates ranged from 45.81% to 115.03%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Absolute symbiotic efficiency of cowpea rhizobia isolates ranged from 32.72 to 233.25%.

Outcome
absolute symbiotic efficiencye0
Value
32.72 to 233.25%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the absolute symbiotic efficiency ranged from 32.72 to 233.25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Symbiotic effectiveness correlated positively and highly significantly with nodule number, nodule dry weight and shoot dry weight per plant.

Organ / stage
nodulee0
Outcome
symbiotic effectivenesse0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
nodule number, nodule dry weight and shoot dry weight per plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“symbiotic effectiveness showed positive and highly significant correlation with nodule number, nodule dry weight and shoot dry weight per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten cowpea rhizobia isolates, 35.72%, were highly effective.

Outcome
highly effectivee0
Value
35.72%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10 isolates (35.72%) were highly effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sixteen cowpea rhizobia isolates, 57.14%, were effective.

Outcome
effectivee0
Value
57.14%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“16 isolates (57.14%) were effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two cowpea rhizobia isolates, 7.14%, were poorly effective.

Outcome
poorly effectivee0
Value
7.14%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two isolates (7.14%) were poorly effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Naturally occurring cowpea rhizobia varied from poorly to highly effective, with effective isolates predominant across Ethiopian agroecological zones.

Interactor
rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
predominance of effective isolatese0
Setting
Ethiopiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“naturally occurring cowpea nodulating rhizobia varied from poorly to highly effective with a predominance of effective isolates in different agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1592 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend further testing of promising cowpea rhizobia isolates for competitiveness, persistence and potential under varied conditions.

Outcome
Further studies are recommended under varied conditions on the competitiveness, persistence, and potential of the promising isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further studies are recommended under varied conditions on the competitiveness, persistence, and potential of the promising isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1759 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–64 · show in text ↑

inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

69 papers: 57 positive, 12 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 92 positive, 10 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.