Paper · 2010 · Journal of Plant Production

RESPONSE OF BARLEY AND VETCH MIXTURE TO PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER LEVELS UNDER RAINFED CONDITIONS AT RAS EL-HEKMA, MATROUH, EGYPT

N. Mohamed; R. Aly

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted at South of Ras El-Hekma (56 km east of Marsa Matrouh city) under rainfed conditions during 2005/ 2006 and 2006/ 2007 winter seasons, to show the response of pure stands of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), vetch (Vicia sativa L.) and their mixture (75 % barley and 25 % vetch) to P-fertilizer levels (0, 7.5, 15 and 22.5 Kg P2 O5/ fad) to study the effect of cropping systems and P-fertilization on grain and straw yields, as well as, field stubble and water use efficiency. The obtained results scribed that, barley- vetch mixture (75 % barley + 25 % vetch) at different growth stages; i.e., booting, 50% heading and physiological stages, was superior to mono-cropping system of barley and vetch in fresh forage, dry matter and field stubble yields, as well as, crude protein yield in both seasons. Also, at harvesting time; i.e., full maturity stage, B-V mixture gave the highest grain and straw yields with higher total crude protein yield. Mixed cropping system was efficiently in water-use compared to pure stands of barley and vetch. The land equivalent ratio (LER) was more than one for mixed cropping system, which also, led to the highest LER in respect to dry matter yield, crude protein yield at different growth stages and harvesting at full maturity. Applying of higher P-fertilizer level; i.e., 22.5 Kg P2O5/ fad gave the highest of studied traits. Economically, barley-vetch mixture with P-fertilizer level of 22.5 Kg P2O5/ fad gave the highest values of gross and net returns, while, B-V mixture with application of 15 Kg P2O5/ fad achieved the highest values of average rate of return (ARR). Ultimately, these results ascertained the importance of entering some of contingent forage crops, such as vetch to associate with barley in mixed-cropping system particularly, with P-fertilization, also to improve the crop/ livestock farming system, which might be contribute in sustainable development of rainfed conditions at Ras El-Hekma, Matrouh, Northwestern coast of Egypt.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The barley-vetch mixture gave higher fresh forage, dry matter and field stubble yields than monocrops of barley and vetch.

Organ / stage
booting, 50% heading and physiological stagese0
Treatment
barley- vetch mixture (75 % barley + 25 % vetch)e0
Outcome
fresh forage, dry matter and field stubble yieldse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
mono-cropping system of barley and vetche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BARLEY AND VETCH MIXTURE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–36 · show in text ↑
e0

“barley- vetch mixture (75 % barley + 25 % vetch) at different growth stages; i.e., booting, 50% heading and physiological stages, was superior to mono-cropping system of barley and vetch in fresh forage, dry matter and field stubble yields, as well as, crude protein yield in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The barley-vetch mixture gave higher crude protein yield than monocrops of barley and vetch in both seasons.

Treatment
barley- vetch mixture (75 % barley + 25 % vetch)e0
Outcome
crude protein yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
mono-cropping system of barley and vetche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BARLEY AND VETCH MIXTURE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–36 · show in text ↑
e0

“barley- vetch mixture (75 % barley + 25 % vetch) at different growth stages; i.e., booting, 50% heading and physiological stages, was superior to mono-cropping system of barley and vetch in fresh forage, dry matter and field stubble yields, as well as, crude protein yield in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At full maturity, the barley-vetch mixture gave the highest grain and straw yields.

Organ / stage
full maturity stagee0
Treatment
B-V mixturee0
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BARLEY AND VETCH MIXTURE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–36 · show in text ↑
e0

“at harvesting time; i.e., full maturity stage, B-V mixture gave the highest grain and straw yields with higher total crude protein yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At full maturity, the barley-vetch mixture gave higher total crude protein yield.

Organ / stage
full maturity stagee0
Treatment
B-V mixturee0
Outcome
total crude protein yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BARLEY AND VETCH MIXTURE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–36 · show in text ↑
e0

“at harvesting time; i.e., full maturity stage, B-V mixture gave the highest grain and straw yields with higher total crude protein yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixed cropping system used water more efficiently than pure stands of barley and vetch.

Treatment
Mixed cropping systeme0
Outcome
water-usee0
Direction
efficientlye0
Comparator
pure stands of barley and vetche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BARLEY AND VETCH MIXTURE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–36 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mixed cropping system was efficiently in water-use compared to pure stands of barley and vetch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1071 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The land equivalent ratio of the mixed cropping system was more than one.

Outcome
land equivalent ratio (LER)e0
Value
more than onee0
Qualifier
for mixed cropping systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BARLEY AND VETCH MIXTURE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–36 · show in text ↑
e0

“The land equivalent ratio (LER) was more than one for mixed cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The land equivalent ratio was highest for dry matter yield and crude protein yield in the mixed cropping system.

Outcome
LERe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
in respect to dry matter yield, crude protein yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BARLEY AND VETCH MIXTURE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–36 · show in text ↑
e0

“led to the highest LER in respect to dry matter yield, crude protein yield at different growth stages and harvesting at full maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher P-fertilizer level of 22.5 Kg P2O5/fad gave the highest value of the studied traits.

Treatment
higher P-fertilizer level; i.e., 22.5 Kg P2O5/ fade0
Outcome
studied traitse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BARLEY AND VETCH MIXTURE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–36 · show in text ↑
e0

“Applying of higher P-fertilizer level; i.e., 22.5 Kg P2O5/ fad gave the highest of studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1394 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The barley-vetch mixture with 22.5 Kg P2O5/fad gave the highest gross and net returns.

Treatment
barley-vetch mixture with P-fertilizer level of 22.5 Kg P2O5/ fade0
Outcome
gross and net returnse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BARLEY AND VETCH MIXTURE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–36 · show in text ↑
e0

“barley-vetch mixture with P-fertilizer level of 22.5 Kg P2O5/ fad gave the highest values of gross and net returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The barley-vetch mixture with 15 Kg P2O5/fad achieved the highest average rate of return.

Treatment
application of 15 Kg P2O5/ fade0
Outcome
average rate of return (ARR)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“BARLEY AND VETCH MIXTURE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–36 · show in text ↑
e0

“B-V mixture with application of 15 Kg P2O5/ fad achieved the highest values of average rate of return (ARR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1640 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Vetch associated with barley in mixed cropping, with P fertilization, is recommended for rainfed farming systems.

Taxon
vetche0
Outcome
to associate with barley in mixed-cropping systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“the importance of entering some of contingent forage crops, such as vetch to associate with barley in mixed-cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1680–1803 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

80 papers: 71 positive, 9 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

intercropping · physiology: water · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.