Paper · 2020 · Scientific Journal of Russian Scientific Research Institute of Land Improvement Problems

WATER CONSUMPTION OF VINE NURSERY GARDEN AT DIFFERENT PLANTING TECHNOLOGIES

A. S. Ovchinnikov; S. M. Grigorov; M. V. Ratanov; et al.

12
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Purpose: substantiation of soil water regime while growing planting material for Kodryanka grapes, which ensures maximum survivability of grape cuttings and the yield of standard seedlings while saving all types of resources. Materials and methods. Cuttings were planted in an earthen ridge (technology A) and a furrow (technology B), drip irrigation – according to three options with a differentiated threshold and a depth of moistening at 80 % minimum water capacity in a layer of 0.0–0.6 m (A1), 80–70 % of minimum water capacity (А2) in the layer of 0.4–0.6 m and 90–70 % of minimum water capacity in the same layer (A3). Fertilizer schemes – the main application of P60K60 into the soil with six-fold fertigation with nitrogen-phosphorus fertilizer (V1), soaking of cuttings in the root formation stimulator (V2), foliage applications (V3). Results. When planting cuttings in ridges (technology A) with the application of mineral fertilizers, drip application at the level of 80 % of minimum water capacity in a layer of 0.0–0.6 m, fertigation N120Р30, the total water consumption of the grape nursery garden was 5457 m³ per ha with an irrigation rate of 3430 m³ per ha, the survivability of grape cuttings is 63.6 % with a yield of standard seedlings of 34.2 %. The application of differentiated irrigation depths of 0.0–0.4 and 0.0–0.6 m and an increase in the pre-irrigation soil moisture threshold to 90 % of minimum water capacity against the background of the application of Ruter Bio and Reasil contributed to an increase in total water consumption to 6127 m³ per ha with a norm of 4100 m³ per ha and increase the survivability of grape cuttings to 82.4 % with the yield of standard seedlings at the level of 62.2 %. When planting cuttings in ridges (technology B) with drip irrigation at the level of 80 % of minimum water capacity in a layer of 0.0–0.6 m and the basic level of fertigation, the total water consumption in the nursery garden was 5287 m³ per ha with an irrigation rate of 3260 m³ per ha, the survival rate of grape cuttings was 67.1 % with an yield of standard seedlings of 38.5 %. Conclusions. The increase of soil moisture threshold to 90 % of minimum water capacity in the initial period of growth and applying the differentiated depth of the moistened soil layer (technology B) using agrochemicals ensured the survivability of grape cuttings at 84.1 % with a yield of standard seedlings of 63.3 %.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Technology A with drip at 80 % of minimum water capacity gave a total nursery water consumption of 5457 m³ per ha.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
drip application at the level of 80 % of minimum water capacity in a layer of 0.0–0.6 me2
Outcome
total water consumptione1
Value
5457 m³ per hae1

Verbatim

e0

“planting material for Kodryanka grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“the total water consumption of the grape nursery garden was 5457 m³ per ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1132 · show in text ↑
e2

“When planting cuttings in ridges (technology A) with the application of mineral fertilizers, drip application at the level of 80 % of minimum water capacity in a layer of 0.0–0.6 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1035 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The irrigation rate under technology A was 3430 m³ per ha.

Taxon
grapese0
Outcome
irrigation ratee3
Value
3430 m³ per hae3

Verbatim

e0

“planting material for Kodryanka grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“with an irrigation rate of 3430 m³ per ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1174 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Survivability of grape cuttings under technology A was 63.6 %.

Taxon
grapese0
Outcome
survivability of grape cuttingse4
Value
63.6 %e4

Verbatim

e0

“planting material for Kodryanka grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
e4

“the survivability of grape cuttings is 63.6 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1221 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield of standard seedlings under technology A was 34.2 %.

Taxon
grapese0
Outcome
yield of standard seedlingse5
Value
34.2 %e5

Verbatim

e0

“planting material for Kodryanka grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
e5

“a yield of standard seedlings of 34.2 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1266 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differentiated irrigation depths with a 90 % pre-irrigation threshold increased total water consumption to 6127 m³ per ha.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
differentiated irrigation depths of 0.0–0.4 and 0.0–0.6 me6
Outcome
total water consumptione6
Direction
increasee6
Value
6127 m³ per hae6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“planting material for Kodryanka grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
e6

“The application of differentiated irrigation depths of 0.0–0.4 and 0.0–0.6 m and an increase in the pre-irrigation soil moisture threshold to 90 % of minimum water capacity against the background of the application of Ruter Bio and Reasil contributed to an increase in total water consumption to 6127 m³ per ha with a norm of 4100 m³ per ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differentiated irrigation depths with a 90 % pre-irrigation threshold increased survivability of grape cuttings to 82.4 %.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
differentiated irrigation depths of 0.0–0.4 and 0.0–0.6 me6
Outcome
survivability of grape cuttingse7
Direction
increasee7
Value
82.4 %e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“planting material for Kodryanka grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
e6

“The application of differentiated irrigation depths of 0.0–0.4 and 0.0–0.6 m and an increase in the pre-irrigation soil moisture threshold to 90 % of minimum water capacity against the background of the application of Ruter Bio and Reasil contributed to an increase in total water consumption to 6127 m³ per ha with a norm of 4100 m³ per ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1608 · show in text ↑
e7

“increase the survivability of grape cuttings to 82.4 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1667 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield of standard seedlings in that treatment was 62.2 %.

Taxon
grapese0
Outcome
yield of standard seedlingse1
Value
62.2 %e1

Verbatim

e0

“planting material for Kodryanka grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the yield of standard seedlings at the level of 62.2 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1668–1727 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Technology B with drip irrigation gave a total nursery water consumption of 5287 m³ per ha.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
drip irrigation at the level of 80 % of minimum water capacity in a layer of 0.0–0.6 me1
Outcome
total water consumptione2
Value
5287 m³ per hae2

Verbatim

e0

“planting material for Kodryanka grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“When planting cuttings in ridges (technology B) with drip irrigation at the level of 80 % of minimum water capacity in a layer of 0.0–0.6 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1868 · show in text ↑
e2

“the total water consumption in the nursery garden was 5287 m³ per ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1905–1973 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Survival rate of grape cuttings under technology B was 67.1 %.

Taxon
grapese0
Outcome
survival rate of grape cuttingse1
Value
67.1 %e1

Verbatim

e0

“planting material for Kodryanka grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“the survival rate of grape cuttings was 67.1 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2063 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield of standard seedlings under technology B was 38.5 %.

Taxon
grapese0
Outcome
yield of standard seedlingse1
Value
38.5 %e1

Verbatim

e0

“planting material for Kodryanka grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“with an yield of standard seedlings of 38.5 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2064–2109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising the soil moisture threshold to 90 % with differentiated moistening depth and agrochemicals ensured survivability of grape cuttings at 84.1 %.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
The increase of soil moisture threshold to 90 % of minimum water capacity in the initial period of growthe2
Outcome
survivability of grape cuttingse1
Value
84.1 %e1

Verbatim

e0

“planting material for Kodryanka grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“the survivability of grape cuttings at 84.1 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2339–2384 · show in text ↑
e2

“The increase of soil moisture threshold to 90 % of minimum water capacity in the initial period of growth and applying the differentiated depth of the moistened soil layer (technology B) using agrochemicals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2124–2330 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield of standard seedlings in that treatment was 63.3 %.

Taxon
grapese0
Outcome
yield of standard seedlingse1
Value
63.3 %e1

Verbatim

e0

“planting material for Kodryanka grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“a yield of standard seedlings of 63.3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2390–2429 · show in text ↑

irrigation · survival · VitisPositive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.