Abstract
Water condition is one of the main concerns in rice production. It is estimated that over 75 percent of world’s rice is produced using continuous flooding practice. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different water level on paddy growth and yield. There are four water treatments with different water levels which are T0 (1 cm), T1 (3 cm), T2 (6 cm) and T3 (9 cm) to clarify the best water level that can give same performance growth and yield as the common water level application by the farmers. The collected parameter data were plant height, number of tillers, number of leaves, relative chlorophyll content, number of panicles, and fresh and dry weight. Completely Randomized Design (CRD) experimental design with five replications was implemented during the experiment. The data retrieved from conducted experiment was analysed by using Minitab software on One-Way ANOVA calculation method. The experiment outcomes show there was no significance difference between the water level on the rice growth. These results suggested that saturated to 1 cm flooding water did not affect rice production and growth. Therefore, it was enough to sustain rice growth production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Rice growth did not differ significantly among water levels.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- water levele0
- Outcome
- rice growthe0
- Direction
- no significance differencee0
- Comparator
- T0 (1 cm), T1 (3 cm), T2 (6 cm) and T3 (9 cm)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was no significance difference between the water level on the rice growth”
t0“rice growth”
e1“T0 (1 cm), T1 (3 cm), T2 (6 cm) and T3 (9 cm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Saturated to 1 cm flooding water was reported not to affect rice production and growth.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- saturated to 1 cm flooding watere0
- Outcome
- rice production and growthe0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
- Comparator
- T0 (1 cm), T1 (3 cm), T2 (6 cm) and T3 (9 cm)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“saturated to 1 cm flooding water did not affect rice production and growth”
e1“T0 (1 cm), T1 (3 cm), T2 (6 cm) and T3 (9 cm)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors consider saturated to 1 cm flooding sufficient to sustain rice production.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Outcome
- it was enough to sustain rice growth productione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“saturated to 1 cm flooding water did not affect rice production and growth. Therefore, it was enough to sustain rice growth production”
The same questions in other papers
flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
282 papers more in this group
See all 286 papers →irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 222 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
287 papers more in this group
See all 291 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.