Abstract
The use of crop models is motivated by the prediction of crop production under climate change and for the evaluation of climate risk adaptation strategies. Therefore, in the present study the performance of DSSAT 4.6 was evaluated in a cropping system involving integrated soil fertility management options that are being promoted as ways of adapting agricultural systems to improve both crop yield and carbon sequestration on highly degraded soils encountered throughout middle Côte d’Ivoire. Experimental data encompassed two seasons in the Guinea savanna zone. Residues from the preceding vegetation were left to dry on plots like mulch on an experimental design that comprised the following treatments: (i) herbaceous savanna-maize, (ii)10 year-old of the shrub Chromolaena odorata fallow-maize (iii) 1 or 2 year-old Lalab pupureus stand-rotation, (iv) the legume L. pupureus -maize rotation; (v) continuous maize crop fertilized with urea; (vi) continuous maize crop fertilized with triple superphosphate; (vii) continuous maize crop, fertilized with both urea and triple superphosphate (TSP); (viii) continuous maize cultivation. The model’s sensitivity analysis was run to figure out how uncertainty of stable organic carbon (SOM3) can generate variation in the prediction of soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics during the monitoring period of two years, within the first soil layer and to estimate the most suitable value. The observed variations were of 0.05 % in total SOC within the short-term and acceptable dynamics of changes were obtained for 0.80% of SOM3. The DSSAT model was calibrated using data from the 2007-2008 season and validated against independent data sets of yield of 2008-2009 to 2011-2012 cropping seasons. After the default values for SOM3 used in the model was substituted by the estimated one from sensitivity analysis, the model predicted average maize yields of 1 454 kg ha-1 across the sites versus an observed average value of 1 736 kg ha-1, R2 of 0.72 and RMSE of 597 kg ha-1. The impact of fallow residues and cropping sequence on maize yield was simulated and compared to conventional fertilizer and control data using historical climate scenarios over 12 years. Improving soil fertility through conservation agriculture cannot maintain grain yield in the same way as conventional urea inputs, although there is better yield stability against high climate variability according to our results.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Total soil organic carbon varied by 0.05% in the short term.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The observed variations were of 0.05 % in total SOC within the short-term”
Claim · model-written summary
A SOM3 value of 0.80% produced acceptable dynamics of change.
Verbatim
e0“acceptable dynamics of changes were obtained for 0.80% of SOM3”
Claim · model-written summary
After SOM3 substitution, DSSAT predicted mean maize yield of 1 454 kg ha-1 versus 1 736 kg ha-1 observed, with R2 0.72 and RMSE 597 kg ha-1.
- Outcome
- average maize yieldse0
- Value
- 1 454 kg ha-1e0
- Qualifier
- 1 736 kg ha-1, R2 of 0.72 and RMSE of 597 kg ha-1e0
- Comparator
- observed average valuee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the model predicted average maize yields of 1 454 kg ha-1 across the sites versus an observed average value of 1 736 kg ha-1, R2 of 0.72 and RMSE of 597 kg ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Conservation agriculture could not maintain grain yield as well as conventional urea inputs.
- Treatment
- conservation agriculturee0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- cannot maintaine0
- Comparator
- conventional urea inputse0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Improving soil fertility through conservation agriculture cannot maintain grain yield in the same way as conventional urea inputs”
t0“ecological agriculture”
t1“on maize yield was simulated”
Claim · model-written summary
Conservation agriculture gave better yield stability against high climate variability.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“there is better yield stability against high climate variability”
e1“on maize yield was simulated”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.