Paper · 2019 · Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics)

Modeling the contribution of ecological agriculture for climate change mitigation in cote d'Ivoire

Omonlola Nadine Worou; Armand W. Koné; Jérôme Tondoh; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The use of crop models is motivated by the prediction of crop production under climate change and for the evaluation of climate risk adaptation strategies. Therefore, in the present study the performance of DSSAT 4.6 was evaluated in a cropping system involving integrated soil fertility management options that are being promoted as ways of adapting agricultural systems to improve both crop yield and carbon sequestration on highly degraded soils encountered throughout middle Côte d’Ivoire. Experimental data encompassed two seasons in the Guinea savanna zone. Residues from the preceding vegetation were left to dry on plots like mulch on an experimental design that comprised the following treatments: (i) herbaceous savanna-maize, (ii)10 year-old of the shrub Chromolaena odorata fallow-maize (iii) 1 or 2 year-old Lalab pupureus stand-rotation, (iv) the legume L. pupureus -maize rotation; (v) continuous maize crop fertilized with urea; (vi) continuous maize crop fertilized with triple superphosphate; (vii) continuous maize crop, fertilized with both urea and triple superphosphate (TSP); (viii) continuous maize cultivation. The model’s sensitivity analysis was run to figure out how uncertainty of stable organic carbon (SOM3) can generate variation in the prediction of soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics during the monitoring period of two years, within the first soil layer and to estimate the most suitable value. The observed variations were of 0.05 % in total SOC within the short-term and acceptable dynamics of changes were obtained for 0.80% of SOM3. The DSSAT model was calibrated using data from the 2007-2008 season and validated against independent data sets of yield of 2008-2009 to 2011-2012 cropping seasons. After the default values for SOM3 used in the model was substituted by the estimated one from sensitivity analysis, the model predicted average maize yields of 1 454 kg ha-1 across the sites versus an observed average value of 1 736 kg ha-1, R2 of 0.72 and RMSE of 597 kg ha-1. The impact of fallow residues and cropping sequence on maize yield was simulated and compared to conventional fertilizer and control data using historical climate scenarios over 12 years. Improving soil fertility through conservation agriculture cannot maintain grain yield in the same way as conventional urea inputs, although there is better yield stability against high climate variability according to our results.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soil organic carbon varied by 0.05% in the short term.

Outcome
total SOCe0
Value
0.05 %e0
Qualifier
within the short-terme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The observed variations were of 0.05 % in total SOC within the short-term”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1503 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A SOM3 value of 0.80% produced acceptable dynamics of change.

Outcome
acceptable dynamics of changese0
Value
0.80%e0

Verbatim

e0

“acceptable dynamics of changes were obtained for 0.80% of SOM3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1570 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

After SOM3 substitution, DSSAT predicted mean maize yield of 1 454 kg ha-1 versus 1 736 kg ha-1 observed, with R2 0.72 and RMSE 597 kg ha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
average maize yieldse0
Value
1 454 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
1 736 kg ha-1, R2 of 0.72 and RMSE of 597 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
observed average valuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the model predicted average maize yields of 1 454 kg ha-1 across the sites versus an observed average value of 1 736 kg ha-1, R2 of 0.72 and RMSE of 597 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1853–2013 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture could not maintain grain yield as well as conventional urea inputs.

Treatment
conservation agriculturee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
cannot maintaine0
Comparator
conventional urea inputse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Improving soil fertility through conservation agriculture cannot maintain grain yield in the same way as conventional urea inputs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2203–2332 · show in text ↑
t0

“ecological agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–51 · show in text ↑
t1

“on maize yield was simulated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2067–2095 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture gave better yield stability against high climate variability.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
yield stabilitye0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
against high climate variabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is better yield stability against high climate variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2343–2407 · show in text ↑
e1

“on maize yield was simulated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2067–2095 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.