Paper · 2020 · Plant Breeding and Biotechnology

Polyethylene Glycol Induced Osmotic Stress Affects Germination and Seedling Establishment of Wheat Genotypes

Shatabdi Ghosh; Md. Abu Shahed; Arif Hasan Khan Robin

12
claims
29
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Wheat is globally an important cereal crop. Environmental stress, especially drought stress can play an important role in the reduction of plant growth, specifically during germination in arid and semi-arid regions. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) treated hydroponic conditions create negative osmotic potential which is compared with moisture deficit stress. The main objective of this study was to investigate the effects of PEG 6000 induced moderate osmotic stress on germination indices of 22 wheat varieties. In order to study the effects of osmotic stress on germination indices in wheat cultivars, an experiment was conducted, using a completely randomized design with three replications under two different levels of PEG-6000: 0% and 10%. PEG stress significantly reduced percent germination, shoot length and root length. PEG stress significantly increased root-shoot ratio and oven dry weight. Principal component analysis revealed response of traits of tolerant wheat varieties under osmotic stress. Correlation study revealed the significant relationships among germination indices. The variety BARI Gom-30 recorded comparatively higher root length (6 cm), shoot length (7.8 cm), root-shoot ratio (1.37) followed by the variety Sonalika whereas the variety Kalaysona recorded the lowest root length (2.7 cm) and shoot length (2.8 cm) under PEG stress. Evolved information of this research including selected traits such as germination percentage, root-shoot ratio and dry weight of seedlings could be exploited in wheat breeding program for drought and osmotic stress tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG stress significantly reduced wheat germination percentage.

Treatment
PEG stresse0
Outcome
percent germinatione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
0%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PEG stress significantly reduced percent germination, shoot length and root length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–824 · show in text ↑
e1

“22 wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–506 · show in text ↑
e2

“0% and 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG stress significantly reduced wheat shoot and root length.

Treatment
PEG stresse0
Outcome
shoot length and root lengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
0%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PEG stress significantly reduced percent germination, shoot length and root length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–824 · show in text ↑
e1

“22 wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–506 · show in text ↑
e2

“0% and 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG stress significantly increased wheat root-shoot ratio and oven dry weight.

Treatment
PEG stresse0
Outcome
root-shoot ratio and oven dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
0%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PEG stress significantly increased root-shoot ratio and oven dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–897 · show in text ↑
e1

“22 wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–506 · show in text ↑
e2

“0% and 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–739 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Principal component analysis distinguished trait responses of tolerant wheat varieties under osmotic stress.

Outcome
response of traits of tolerant wheat varietiese0
Comparator
osmotic stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Principal component analysis revealed response of traits of tolerant wheat varieties under osmotic stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1004 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination indices in wheat showed significant relationships.

Organ / stage
germinatione0
Outcome
relationships among germination indicese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Correlation study revealed the significant relationships among germination indices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1088 · show in text ↑
e1

“22 wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–506 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under PEG stress, BARI Gom-30 had comparatively higher root length of 6 cm than other varieties.

Material
BARI Gom-30e0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
highere0
Value
6 cme0
Qualifier
under PEG stresse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The variety BARI Gom-30 recorded comparatively higher root length (6 cm), shoot length (7.8 cm), root-shoot ratio (1.37) followed by the variety Sonalika”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1242 · show in text ↑
e1

“22 wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–506 · show in text ↑
e2

“under PEG stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1356 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under PEG stress, BARI Gom-30 had comparatively higher shoot length of 7.8 cm.

Material
BARI Gom-30e0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Value
7.8 cme0
Qualifier
under PEG stresse2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The variety BARI Gom-30 recorded comparatively higher root length (6 cm), shoot length (7.8 cm), root-shoot ratio (1.37) followed by the variety Sonalika”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1242 · show in text ↑
e1

“22 wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–506 · show in text ↑
e2

“under PEG stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1356 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under PEG stress, BARI Gom-30 had root-shoot ratio 1.37.

Material
BARI Gom-30e0
Outcome
root-shoot ratioe0
Value
1.37e0
Qualifier
under PEG stresse2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The variety BARI Gom-30 recorded comparatively higher root length (6 cm), shoot length (7.8 cm), root-shoot ratio (1.37) followed by the variety Sonalika”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1242 · show in text ↑
e1

“22 wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–506 · show in text ↑
e2

“under PEG stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1356 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sonalika followed BARI Gom-30 for the measured seedling traits.

Material
Sonalikae0
Outcome
root length (6 cm), shoot length (7.8 cm), root-shoot ratio (1.37)e0
Qualifier
under PEG stresse2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length (6 cm), shoot length (7.8 cm), root-shoot ratio (1.37) followed by the variety Sonalika”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1242 · show in text ↑
e1

“22 wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–506 · show in text ↑
e2

“under PEG stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1356 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kalaysona had the lowest root length, 2.7 cm, under PEG stress.

Material
Kalaysonae0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.7 cme0
Qualifier
under PEG stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the variety Kalaysona recorded the lowest root length (2.7 cm) and shoot length (2.8 cm) under PEG stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1356 · show in text ↑
e1

“22 wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–506 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kalaysona had shoot length 2.8 cm under PEG stress, the lowest among varieties.

Material
Kalaysonae0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Value
2.8 cme0
Qualifier
under PEG stresse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the variety Kalaysona recorded the lowest root length (2.7 cm) and shoot length (2.8 cm) under PEG stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1356 · show in text ↑
e1

“22 wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–506 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose using germination, root-shoot ratio and seedling dry weight in wheat breeding for stress tolerance.

Outcome
selected traits such as germination percentage, root-shoot ratio and dry weight of seedlings could be exploited in wheat breeding program for drought and osmotic stress tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“selected traits such as germination percentage, root-shoot ratio and dry weight of seedlings could be exploited in wheat breeding program for drought and osmotic stress tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1583 · show in text ↑

poly(ethylene glycol) · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 6 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.