Paper · 2020 · Applied Ecology and Environmental Research

CO-APPLICATION OF HUMIC ACID AND BACILLUS STRAINS ENHANCES SEED AND OIL YIELDS BY MEDIATING NUTRIENT ACQUISITION OF SAFFLOWER (CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L.) PLANTS IN A SEMI-ARID REGION

Z. EKIN

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Faced with the deterioration of natural resources, current trends in agriculture are focused on seeking eco-friendly methods to improve plant growth promotion and crop productivity. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and humic substances can improve crop production in sustainable farming due to their various features. This study examined how humic acid (HA) and inoculation with PGPR (Bacillus megatorium and Bacillus subtilis) affect the agronomic performance of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in a semi-arid environment. In the field experiments, PGPR inoculated and non-inoculated safflower seeds were cultivated in soil treated with humic acid (0, 200, 300, and 400 kg ha -1 ), alone or in combination. It was observed that PGPR and HA improved growth, yield parameters and seed mineral contents. Their plant growth responded positively to inoculation with Bacillus sp. strains owing to the N-fixing and P-solubilizing capabilities, whereas greatly positive response in the seed yield and quality was found when applied in combination with humic acids. The combined application of 300 and 400 kg ha -1 HA with Bacillus subtilis inoculation enhanced seed and oil yields by an average of 162% and 221% relative to the control plants. This study confirms that integrated management strategies can ensure higher crop productivity of safflower in sustainable and semi-arid environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR and HA improved safflower growth.

Treatment
PGPR and HAe0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was observed that PGPR and HA improved growth, yield parameters and seed mineral contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“SAFFLOWER (CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR and HA improved safflower yield parameters.

Treatment
PGPR and HAe0
Outcome
yield parameterse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was observed that PGPR and HA improved growth, yield parameters and seed mineral contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“SAFFLOWER (CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR and HA improved safflower seed mineral contents.

Treatment
PGPR and HAe0
Outcome
seed mineral contentse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was observed that PGPR and HA improved growth, yield parameters and seed mineral contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“SAFFLOWER (CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–151 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Safflower growth responded positively to Bacillus inoculation, attributed to nitrogen fixing and phosphorus solubilizing.

Treatment
inoculation with Bacillus sp. strainse0
Interactor
Bacillus sp. strainse0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth responded positivelye0
Qualifier
N-fixing and P-solubilizing capabilitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Their plant growth responded positively to inoculation with Bacillus sp. strains owing to the N-fixing and P-solubilizing capabilities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“SAFFLOWER (CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application with humic acids gave a strongly positive response in safflower seed yield and quality.

Treatment
combination with humic acidse0
Outcome
seed yield and qualitye0
Direction
positive responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greatly positive response in the seed yield and quality was found when applied in combination with humic acids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“SAFFLOWER (CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined HA at 300 and 400 kg ha -1 with Bacillus subtilis inoculation enhanced seed yield by an average of 162% relative to controls.

Treatment
300 and 400 kg ha -1 HA with Bacillus subtilis inoculatione0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
seede0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
162%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of 300 and 400 kg ha -1 HA with Bacillus subtilis inoculation enhanced seed and oil yields by an average of 162% and 221% relative to the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“SAFFLOWER (CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined HA at 300 and 400 kg ha -1 with Bacillus subtilis inoculation enhanced oil yield by an average of 221% relative to controls.

Treatment
300 and 400 kg ha -1 HA with Bacillus subtilis inoculatione0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
oil yieldse0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
221%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of 300 and 400 kg ha -1 HA with Bacillus subtilis inoculation enhanced seed and oil yields by an average of 162% and 221% relative to the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“SAFFLOWER (CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–151 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

other · quality: general · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

other · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.