Abstract
Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of pre-harvest desiccant herbicides on the yield and the physiological and technological quality of cowpea seeds after harvest and after storage. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design with four replications. A split-plot design (6 × 2) was composed of the desiccant herbicides flumioxazin (30 g ai.ha-1), glufosinate ammonium (500 g ai.ha-1), paraquat (400 g ai.ha-1), saflufenacil (70 g ai.ha-1), and carfentrazone (24 g ai.ha-1) and an untreated control, as well as two seed evaluation periods, at harvest and six months after h arvest. Desiccants were applied at the R5 stage. The desiccants affected the yield, classification, color, and physiological quality of seeds of ‘BRS Guariba’. The glufosinate ammonium and paraquat herbicides compromised seed physiological quality. Flumioxazin did not affect seed yield components, color, and physiological quality. Storage at 20 °C for six months affected seed physiological quality.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Desiccants affected yield, classification, color and physiological quality of BRS Guariba seeds.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Material
- BRS Guaribae0
- Treatment
- desiccantse0
- Outcome
- yield, classification, color, and physiological qualitye0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The desiccants affected the yield, classification, color, and physiological quality of seeds of ‘BRS Guariba’.”
t0“Cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Glufosinate ammonium compromised seed physiological quality.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- glufosinate ammoniume0
- Outcome
- seed physiological qualitye0
- Direction
- compromisede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The glufosinate ammonium and paraquat herbicides compromised seed physiological quality.”
t0“Cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Paraquat compromised seed physiological quality.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- paraquate0
- Outcome
- seed physiological qualitye0
- Direction
- compromisede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The glufosinate ammonium and paraquat herbicides compromised seed physiological quality.”
t0“Cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Flumioxazin did not affect seed yield components, color or physiological quality.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- Flumioxazine0
- Outcome
- seed yield components, color, and physiological qualitye0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Flumioxazin did not affect seed yield components, color, and physiological quality.”
t0“Cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Six months of storage at 20 °C affected seed physiological quality.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- Storage at 20 °C for six monthse0
- Outcome
- seed physiological qualitye0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Storage at 20 °C for six months affected seed physiological quality.”
t0“Cowpea”
The same questions in other papers
glufosinate · quality: general · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
nitrogen · quality: general · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.