Abstract
The research on productivity, energy-use efficiency and economics of pigeonpea based cropping system, viz., pigeonpea–wheat, pigeonpea – barley, pigeonpea – lentil, pigeonpea – field pea and pigeonpea – toria compared with rice–wheat cropping system was carried out at the Experimental Research Block of School of Agricultural Sciences, SGRRU, Uttarakhand. These cropping systems were evaluated under rainfed conditions. Results showed that all the pigeonpea – based cropping system were significantly superior to traditional rice – wheat cropping system in terms of productivity, net returns, benefit:cost ratio and net energy returns. Pigeonpea – lentil cropping system proved superior in terms of system net returns (Rs 63,616/ha), benefit:cost ratio (1.64) and energy ratio (1.94) to pigeonpea - wheat, pigeonpea – barley, pigeonpea - field pea and pigeonpea - toria cropping system. The plots under rice - wheat cropping system recorded the lowest pigeonpea-equivalent yield (1.32 t/ha), net returns (Rs 2,750/ha) and benefit:cost ratio (0.06). The nutrient status of the soil improved significantly due to pigeonpea – lentil cropping system over other cropping systems. Pigeonpea – lentil cropping system proved to be the best in terms of monetary returns, net energy return and soil productivity and hence, could be adopted in the mid-hill regions under rainfed conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
All pigeonpea-based cropping systems were significantly superior to rice – wheat in productivity, net returns and benefit:cost ratio.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- pigeonpea – based cropping systeme1
- Outcome
- productivity, net returns, benefit:cost ratioe1
- Direction
- superiore1
- Comparator
- traditional rice – wheat cropping systeme1
- Setting
- Uttarakhande0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] Based Cropping Systems”
e0“carried out at the Experimental Research Block of School of Agricultural Sciences, SGRRU, Uttarakhand”
e1“Results showed that all the pigeonpea – based cropping system were significantly superior to traditional rice – wheat cropping system in terms of productivity, net returns, benefit:cost ratio and net energy returns”
Claim · model-written summary
All pigeonpea-based cropping systems were significantly superior to rice – wheat in net energy returns.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- pigeonpea – based cropping systeme1
- Outcome
- net energy returnse1
- Direction
- superiore1
- Comparator
- traditional rice – wheat cropping systeme1
- Setting
- Uttarakhande0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] Based Cropping Systems”
e0“carried out at the Experimental Research Block of School of Agricultural Sciences, SGRRU, Uttarakhand”
e1“Results showed that all the pigeonpea – based cropping system were significantly superior to traditional rice – wheat cropping system in terms of productivity, net returns, benefit:cost ratio and net energy returns”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea – lentil system had net returns of Rs 63,616/ha, superior to the other pigeonpea systems.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- Pigeonpea – lentil cropping systeme2
- Outcome
- system net returnse2
- Direction
- superiore2
- Value
- Rs 63,616/hae2
- Comparator
- pigeonpea - wheate2
- Setting
- Uttarakhande0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] Based Cropping Systems”
e0“carried out at the Experimental Research Block of School of Agricultural Sciences, SGRRU, Uttarakhand”
e2“Pigeonpea – lentil cropping system proved superior in terms of system net returns (Rs 63,616/ha), benefit:cost ratio (1.64) and energy ratio (1.94) to pigeonpea - wheat, pigeonpea – barley, pigeonpea - field pea and pigeonpea - toria cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea – lentil system had a benefit:cost ratio of 1.64, superior to the other pigeonpea systems.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- Pigeonpea – lentil cropping systeme2
- Outcome
- benefit:cost ratioe2
- Direction
- superiore2
- Value
- 1.64e2
- Comparator
- pigeonpea - wheate2
- Setting
- Uttarakhande0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] Based Cropping Systems”
e0“carried out at the Experimental Research Block of School of Agricultural Sciences, SGRRU, Uttarakhand”
e2“Pigeonpea – lentil cropping system proved superior in terms of system net returns (Rs 63,616/ha), benefit:cost ratio (1.64) and energy ratio (1.94) to pigeonpea - wheat, pigeonpea – barley, pigeonpea - field pea and pigeonpea - toria cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea – lentil system had an energy ratio of 1.94, superior to the other pigeonpea systems.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- Pigeonpea – lentil cropping systeme2
- Outcome
- energy ratioe2
- Direction
- superiore2
- Value
- 1.94e2
- Comparator
- pigeonpea - wheate2
- Setting
- Uttarakhande0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] Based Cropping Systems”
e0“carried out at the Experimental Research Block of School of Agricultural Sciences, SGRRU, Uttarakhand”
e2“Pigeonpea – lentil cropping system proved superior in terms of system net returns (Rs 63,616/ha), benefit:cost ratio (1.64) and energy ratio (1.94) to pigeonpea - wheat, pigeonpea – barley, pigeonpea - field pea and pigeonpea - toria cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
Rice – wheat recorded the lowest pigeonpea-equivalent yield, 1.32 t/ha.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- rice - wheat cropping systeme3
- Outcome
- pigeonpea-equivalent yielde3
- Direction
- loweste3
- Value
- 1.32 t/hae3
- Setting
- Uttarakhande0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] Based Cropping Systems”
e0“carried out at the Experimental Research Block of School of Agricultural Sciences, SGRRU, Uttarakhand”
e3“The plots under rice - wheat cropping system recorded the lowest pigeonpea-equivalent yield (1.32 t/ha), net returns (Rs 2,750/ha) and benefit:cost ratio (0.06)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rice – wheat recorded the lowest net returns, Rs 2,750/ha.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- rice - wheat cropping systeme3
- Outcome
- net returnse3
- Direction
- loweste3
- Value
- Rs 2,750/hae3
- Setting
- Uttarakhande0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] Based Cropping Systems”
e0“carried out at the Experimental Research Block of School of Agricultural Sciences, SGRRU, Uttarakhand”
e3“The plots under rice - wheat cropping system recorded the lowest pigeonpea-equivalent yield (1.32 t/ha), net returns (Rs 2,750/ha) and benefit:cost ratio (0.06)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rice – wheat recorded the lowest benefit:cost ratio, 0.06.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- rice - wheat cropping systeme3
- Outcome
- benefit:cost ratioe3
- Direction
- loweste3
- Value
- 0.06e3
- Setting
- Uttarakhande0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] Based Cropping Systems”
e0“carried out at the Experimental Research Block of School of Agricultural Sciences, SGRRU, Uttarakhand”
e3“The plots under rice - wheat cropping system recorded the lowest pigeonpea-equivalent yield (1.32 t/ha), net returns (Rs 2,750/ha) and benefit:cost ratio (0.06)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea – lentil cropping system significantly improved soil nutrient status compared with other cropping systems.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- pigeonpea – lentil cropping systeme4
- Outcome
- nutrient status of the soile4
- Direction
- improvede4
- Comparator
- other cropping systemse4
- Setting
- Uttarakhande0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] Based Cropping Systems”
e0“carried out at the Experimental Research Block of School of Agricultural Sciences, SGRRU, Uttarakhand”
e4“The nutrient status of the soil improved significantly due to pigeonpea – lentil cropping system over other cropping systems”
Claim · model-written summary
Pigeonpea – lentil cropping system could be adopted in mid-hill regions under rainfed conditions.
- Taxon
- Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
- Outcome
- adoptede5
- Setting
- mid-hill regions under rainfed conditionse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] Based Cropping Systems”
e5“could be adopted in the mid-hill regions under rainfed conditions”
The same questions in other papers
Triticum aestivum · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
Oryza sativa · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
cultivation system · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.